Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 325 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary Part II transcript of the Gemini 5 (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by the Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division and dated September 2, 1965. It records astronauts Cooper and Conrad at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy. They discuss how the spacecraft systems worked, including the platform and the OAMS thruster failures. The transcript also covers operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, training, premission planning, and medical aspects. It was originally classified Confidential.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 30 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Astronauts L. Gordon Cooper and Charles “Pete” Conrad described observing debris and “snow” and “all sorts of glittering pieces of this, that and the other thing” in the “Visual Sightings” section of the document (pages 157-220).

  • p. 270 …check the scanners . You ought to have a de tailed procedure laid out in advance. If…
  • p. 302 …With the accurate star chart updated and then finding the stars on there , then you could…
261
13.0 MI3SION CONTRO:
13. 1 GO/ NO GO
Cooper GO/NO GO ' s--I think we ' re fine . I don ' t s ee anything
wrong with the GO/NO GO's.
13. 2 Pl~ and CLA Updat~s
Cooper
Conrad
13 Consumables
Cooper
::.,onrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
..
I thought those went all right . Do you?
Yes , we had a hip pocket place to go on every or bit .
Consumables--In general we had a pretty good handle
on those. The oxygen, the OAMS- -
We had one anomally on the OAMS . I still don ' t think
we lifted off with the right OAMS propellant .
No , I don ' t think so either . We had 87 percent- -
87 percent on liftof f and they never answered that
question for us .
We did ask why we had this r eading rather than 100
percent and we never got that answer . We asked this
shortly before liftoff .
This may have had to do with the fact that we had
full fuel but not a full load of oxydizer based on
that 1 , 25 mixture ratio. My understanding was that
we were supposed to liftoff with 100 percent on the
gage. I ' m not saying that wa s correct but it took
I
us by surprise when they blew the Squibs a
couple of minutes before liftoff and had 87 percent
«e~FIDi~il.l;<L

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 325 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.