Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 325 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary Part II transcript of the Gemini 5 (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by the Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division and dated September 2, 1965. It records astronauts Cooper and Conrad at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy. They discuss how the spacecraft systems worked, including the platform and the OAMS thruster failures. The transcript also covers operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, training, premission planning, and medical aspects. It was originally classified Confidential.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 30 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida. Astronauts L. Gordon Cooper and Charles “Pete” Conrad described observing debris and “snow” and “all sorts of glittering pieces of this, that and the other thing” in the “Visual Sightings” section of the document (pages 157-220).

  • p. 160 …I saw individual houses up in Tibet. One thing I didn't see for Gordo was…
  • p. 242 …shots down of Saigon, Tibet , Tibet , China, Japan , Arabian desert , Tibet , Tibet, China, Arabia, Hanoy, Phillipine…
  • p. 243 232 storm Doreen, West Coast , South Americ a , Andes , Formosa, big Islands of Japan , Tibet mountains…
  • p. 244 …Greed on Tibet? No , that was Gordo -- he real ly goes for that Ti beten country…
-
••
142
Cooper
FCSD Rep
Cooper
FCSD Rep
Cooper
already gone through all the sequences ~1d everything
by then.
Okay, let's see. Designated targets--
I think you have covered that pretty much.
Yes , all the targets .
The targets that they have designated versus what ••
Yes . Okay, well the designated targets- - There are
some al ternate targets right in the are1:.s here that
I ' ve already mentioned. I mentioned a c:ouple of
cases there that could possibly be bettnr targets
than the ones that they selected, although there
is nothing wrong, particularly, with thr, ones that
they selected . I personally liked a little bit
better than on target 212 , or Sequence 212 , this
point of land . I thought a little more distinctive
was the point of land that came out of a l ittl e
town called San Pedro, just north of there on the
same lake . That 's spmething to consider . It 's a
point of land that is quite distinct because it is
fairly heavy. A big mountain sort of c:ame right
down into the lake and dropped off into it , and it ·
was quite a prominent point of land . ::t is very
shear and precise, whereas, it is a l i ·;tle bigger
point. Although, from a great distanc,~ farther out,

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 325 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.