Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part I, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 223 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini V (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated September 1, 1965. It records Cooper and Conrad's operational account from the debriefing held August 30 to September 1, 1965 at Cape Kennedy. Topics include countdown, window fogging, POGO vibration, fairing jettison debris, radio loss, reentry and recovery. Visual sightings are left for a later part of the debriefing.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 2 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida.

  • p. 213 …Then we ca.me OFF on the repress and we opened .. our face plates, Then we…
195EMftA1. ,,
which gave me one little old tweak of suspicion
there that something was wrong right there on the
roll bug. At that point then, I rolled 90 to see
if I could get on that too , the down range needle.
The cross range needle moved in some from the right.
It had been out . . . not completely full scale, but
' I
quite a ways out . It moved in slightly but not
much. Down range needle, let's see , I don't believe
it ever moved up · from there on and then at that
point when I saw that the 90 wasn ' t going to hold it
in there, I said I was going back to the nominal
bank angle. I went back t o the 53 but then put in
60 . . . . 67 degrees bank right, to see if I can get the
roll bug to change . It didn ' t change at that time
so cross range was still indicating that I should
be banked left so I went back to my bank left to
see if I can kill off the cross range. I knew at
that point that something was really seriously
- 0llg and I was just trying to hold it as nominal
as possible . I shoul d have probably at that time
since I was already passed the time of reverse bank
angle, I probably shoul d have gone ahead and hel d
that , but that was a mistake, I probably should have
gone ahead and held that 67 degrees bank right, and
•

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 223 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.