Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part I, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 223 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini V (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated September 1, 1965. It records Cooper and Conrad's operational account from the debriefing held August 30 to September 1, 1965 at Cape Kennedy. Topics include countdown, window fogging, POGO vibration, fairing jettison debris, radio loss, reentry and recovery. Visual sightings are left for a later part of the debriefing.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 2 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida.

  • p. 22 …5 or 6 gray splots, just small ones , very small little gray- type splots and I…
  • p. 105 …We al so found that little-hook up was i •eeling gray paint off of those…
  • p. 131 …there were about foUT or five little gray flecks of etuff and debris just flew everywhere…
  • p. 182 …I Looking 180 from the sun you re looking into a gray , black, fuzzy -- boy, there…
188
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
Conrad
I
Because that ' s exactly the way things ar E' all set
up in the math flow. You' 11 get that anc. then very
shortly thereafter if you hold the nomim.l bank
angle it will take a little bit of time End it will
start easing on up.
And you ' ll get an idea by the rate of ea~ing up .
If you roll to the 90, of course, in thai position
you ' ll get to it in a big rush, but you \\-ant to be
careful not to overshoot .
You'll never get back.
But, then when I held the nominal bank angl e and
it didn ' t come up and didn't come up , then I rolled
to the 90 to see if I was going to be able to bring
it up. Of course, by this time I realized that
when I didn't see it come up something wa.s really
wrong. I then went back to the nominal . Fortunately,
that period that we held at the nominal is what
carried us down as near as it did. The short period
that we were at 90, of course , is where ~e were
really digging in--
It cost us 83 miles, probably, because I think if ..
we had flown the nominal bank angle all the way that
we'd have really wound up real close to the darn
carrier.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 223 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.