Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part I, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 223 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini V (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated September 1, 1965. It records Cooper and Conrad's operational account from the debriefing held August 30 to September 1, 1965 at Cape Kennedy. Topics include countdown, window fogging, POGO vibration, fairing jettison debris, radio loss, reentry and recovery. Visual sightings are left for a later part of the debriefing.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 2 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida.

  • p. 22 …5 or 6 gray splots, just small ones , very small little gray- type splots and I…
  • p. 105 …We al so found that little-hook up was i •eeling gray paint off of those…
  • p. 131 …there were about foUT or five little gray flecks of etuff and debris just flew everywhere…
  • p. 182 …I Looking 180 from the sun you re looking into a gray , black, fuzzy -- boy, there…
1856NFIDENTIA[ .
Cooper •.• to get on down to it because it told me--
Conrad We were just sitting there waiting for the needle
to come up like we had seen it do a million_.:t.ime
-- -
-------in the same situation. It never came off the peg.
Then , we got in a little discussion, you know. I
fel t that we ought to go to full lift because I
thought something was wrong with guidance . Gordo
agreed that something was wrong with guidance but
he reall y t hought maybe we really had over- shot .
I'm sure the retros were on time and they were
nominal , almost. So , we final l y wound up going back
to the nominal l ift vect or- -
Cooper I went back to the nominal bank angle, which we had
agreed we ' d go to i f anything happened . We had agreed
with FOD that if anything happened throughout re
entry--something was wrong with guidance--
Conrad We flew--
Cooper --we would go back to the nominal bank angle , that
we wouldn't take any great abnormal- type situation.
We woul d go back to t he nominal bank angle, so that
in the event they lost communication with us or
something screwed completely up in the reentry,
they would know that we used as near as possible to
the nominal bank angle.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 223 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.