Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part I, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 223 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini V (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated September 1, 1965. It records Cooper and Conrad's operational account from the debriefing held August 30 to September 1, 1965 at Cape Kennedy. Topics include countdown, window fogging, POGO vibration, fairing jettison debris, radio loss, reentry and recovery. Visual sightings are left for a later part of the debriefing.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 2 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida.

  • p. 22 …5 or 6 gray splots, just small ones , very small little gray- type splots and I…
  • p. 105 …We al so found that little-hook up was i •eeling gray paint off of those…
  • p. 131 …there were about foUT or five little gray flecks of etuff and debris just flew everywhere…
  • p. 182 …I Looking 180 from the sun you re looking into a gray , black, fuzzy -- boy, there…
183
5.6 Communications
Cooper
Conrad
Cooper
FCSD Rep
Conrad
Cooper
Cooper
Conrad
t1'EITTIA7: ~
Communications were good throughout the whole re
entry. We went into blackout right on time .
Right on time.
Yes, just right on the second when they said we' d
go into blackout. We came out just exactly when
they said we would.. The only thing was, when they
asked us what our over - shoot or under-shoot was
I ' ll be dam if I could t ell them at that point .
I sure as heck didn't know with this computer t ell
ing us one thing and yet it not doing the right
thing.
We'd better put the retrofire IVI readings in here .
269 aft , 010 l eft , 181 down . And that comes out
amazingly close to a nominal combination . As a
matter of fact, it shows that we should have had
about a 60 degree bank. angle, and if you compensate
the 6o degrees for the off- set it would have been
54 or 53--
Yes.
Almost completely nominal.
I think this chart's a handy gouge . It agrees with
what the ground gave us. We didn' t fly it, of
course, We flew the computer, but--

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 223 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.