Documents / Official release

Gemini 5 Technical Debriefing, Part I, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 223 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of the Gemini V (GT-5) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated September 1, 1965. It records Cooper and Conrad's operational account from the debriefing held August 30 to September 1, 1965 at Cape Kennedy. Topics include countdown, window fogging, POGO vibration, fairing jettison debris, radio loss, reentry and recovery. Visual sightings are left for a later part of the debriefing.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: August 2 - September 2, 1965, Cape Kennedy, Florida. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 5 flight crew technical debriefing. NASA conducted this debriefing between August 30, 1965, and September 2, 1965, at the Crew Quarters, Cape Kennedy, Florida.

  • p. 22 …5 or 6 gray splots, just small ones , very small little gray- type splots and I…
  • p. 105 …We al so found that little-hook up was i •eeling gray paint off of those…
  • p. 131 …there were about foUT or five little gray flecks of etuff and debris just flew everywhere…
  • p. 182 …I Looking 180 from the sun you re looking into a gray , black, fuzzy -- boy, there…
170 ONFl[;)ENTIAL
out yesterday and that the load in it was valid . It 1 s
just that they computed the wrong place to land , in
Houston, and sent the wrong load , period . Boy , that
was a heck of a thing to do, and I really that darn
I 1
DCS! m going to do just what I said I was going to
do. I f I ever fly again , I ' m not going to fly with
that DCS circuit breaker on. That ' s just exactly what
I was afraid was going to happen, and they couldn ' t
have done it at a worse time in the flient . They
just absolutely couldn't have done it wcrse . The
one thing that I had forgotten many times was putting
that computer from PRELAUNCH to REENTRY. I had it
underlined 50 times on the check- off liflt . I was
going to make sure that it was in REENTI'.Y . When they
told me leaving the Cape we had a valid load and a
valid TR , I called McDivitt and I said :: 1 m putting
the computer in REENTRY. The next thin/~ is , at
Carnarvon the guy should have seen on h:.s board that
the computer was in REENTRY and should have told me
instead of sending a load like he did . We moved as
f ast as we could when he said he was sending loads
to put the darn thing back to PRELAUNCH . That really
screwed us up and I 1 m really mad about that . That ' s
the only gripe I have against them, but it's a major one .

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 223 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.