Documents / Official release

Gemini 4 Experiment Debriefing, 1967

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 224 pages · text from the file's own layer

This NASA file from 1965 combines Mission Operation Report M-913-65-04 on the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight with related correspondence. Memoranda from the Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight describe the planned four-day mission with James McDivitt and Edward White, including a spacewalk, a rendezvous with the booster second stage and thirteen experiments. Later letters and telegrams from NASA's Manned Space Science office concern the astronaut debriefing and requests for GT-4 photography and film for scientific analysis.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: June 3-7, 1965, Low Earth Orbit. Gemini IV was the second crewed mission of the Gemini series. Astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White successfully completed the four-day flight between June 3 and June 7, 1965. The mission included the first American spacewalk. This collection of documents contains a transcription of the astronauts recounting their observations of bright particles outside the spacecraft, dated circa June 25, 1967, on pages 78-81, and page 101.

  • p. 20 …Figure 14 shows one of the photos taken by Gordon Cooper which is similar to the…
  • p. 91 3Belt 17 And I personally asked Glen, Cochran, Schirr a , a nd Cooper if they say…
  • p. 99 …Were Cooper and :·ic.:hi r.ra i n the d.::tyti!ne '! Go.w a…
  • p. 100 …And when Cooper woke up , he was mostly in the daytime. He (not iced) out on…
  • p. 132 …The point streaked through space on its Cooper had repaired his of closest approach to the…
  • p. 133 …tha~ barring Cooper reported that he had the day's assigned experi- At that time Cooper…
  • p. 134 …You look real Cooper and Conrad got a fine strange readouts" from their each, "pretty nearly…
  • p. 135 …Strong told the engi- perform." Cooper continued thge ah 3~~et b't the 32d with…
Belt l7
couldn 't do any more than look out.
You couldn' t aim at a particular point and correct for-
No, because it amounted to looking over this way and then controlling the
spacecraft back that way.
In addition to that, you had up and down, which is worse.
A redu ed .
That' s the reason I a sked the question. I wondered i f you had used that
paJ:rti cular thing and whether it was useful .
You could see what you were looking at, yes, but, controlling a space
craft, no . I think you could have ma.de a little near - actually got around
to t hat part of it . .... you did the firs t time . But if you wanted
to t ake a picture of s specific ob ject, and one person was controlling
t he space craft and the other person was going to take the picture, he
could take the pictures when he saw them in the viewer . control
the spacecraft too it would be a -
One other point i s how accurately do you think you can point a photo-system
with the optical site'
Cert ainly with .:ta half a degree .
Plus o minns half ad gree .
robably l os than that . Maybe on the order of a quarter.
Do yo u have a picture of the site agai n?
No, we don't .
There ' s a dt fercnce between the open bars on the site .
Do you hav~ to go , Bill?
No, I don ' t .
can give you n b tter answer if you come and ask me in a day or t woI

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 224 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.