Documents / Official release

Gemini 4 Experiment Debriefing, 1967

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965 · 224 pages · text from the file's own layer

This NASA file from 1965 combines Mission Operation Report M-913-65-04 on the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight with related correspondence. Memoranda from the Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight describe the planned four-day mission with James McDivitt and Edward White, including a spacewalk, a rendezvous with the booster second stage and thirteen experiments. Later letters and telegrams from NASA's Manned Space Science office concern the astronaut debriefing and requests for GT-4 photography and film for scientific analysis.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: June 3-7, 1965, Low Earth Orbit. Gemini IV was the second crewed mission of the Gemini series. Astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White successfully completed the four-day flight between June 3 and June 7, 1965. The mission included the first American spacewalk. This collection of documents contains a transcription of the astronauts recounting their observations of bright particles outside the spacecraft, dated circa June 25, 1967, on pages 78-81, and page 101.

  • p. 20 …Figure 14 shows one of the photos taken by Gordon Cooper which is similar to the…
  • p. 91 3Belt 17 And I personally asked Glen, Cochran, Schirr a , a nd Cooper if they say…
  • p. 99 …Were Cooper and :·ic.:hi r.ra i n the d.::tyti!ne '! Go.w a…
  • p. 100 …And when Cooper woke up , he was mostly in the daytime. He (not iced) out on…
  • p. 132 …The point streaked through space on its Cooper had repaired his of closest approach to the…
  • p. 133 …tha~ barring Cooper reported that he had the day's assigned experi- At that time Cooper…
  • p. 134 …You look real Cooper and Conrad got a fine strange readouts" from their each, "pretty nearly…
  • p. 135 …Strong told the engi- perform." Cooper continued thge ah 3~~et b't the 32d with…
up to the 1>ilot 1 s
There
Belt 17 8
. It 1 s the same kind of problem we have associated with the
booster. We spend quite a bit of time ahead of time trying to determine
exactly how much of t he tumbling b ooster we could plan to go up and take a
look at and we finally came to the conclusion that it was
good judgment to approach the booster using his O'W?l j udgment on it.
just wasn 1t a way to put a hand.J.e on it - well it's tumbling so many de
grees and out of plane and you can go or you can 1t go. I think if you see
it, you 'll know whether you can or you cant .
Is the problems connected with the difficulties in closing the hatch
unidentified?
They ' re working on those , I t hink. I'm not sure that they completely
ompleted the case .
I was asked to find out whether we have some lubricants in the very close
cauldrons was contributed
I think that kind of inf'orma.tion should come from t he systems people who
have done a lot of work on it.
Yes, t t ' i t1k ..... •.••• . •..•...•••••••.••.•
Are there any other general questions?
Yes, I have one . In your effort to photograph specif i c objects on the
groun, wh~t kind of siting devices - . did you use optical siting? Did
you try at any time to use the reflex viewing arrangement of the 35 mm?
uh siting deviL:e
For siting '/
yes .
We looked out through it but it was mounted in s uch a manner that you

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 224 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.