Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source: Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

8. 1 Platform
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
8.0 SYSTEMS OPERATION
Actually, the first portion of any alinement is
to cage the thing. The case of caging the thing
is much more important than the alinement itself.
In the daytime I felt that I could cage the plat
form to a reference with an error plus or minus
about 3 or 4 degrees in all axes . Did you think
we could do that wel l?
Only in the daytime.
The yaw was a little problem. It took longer
to get it, but if you kept after it for awhil e ,
I felt that you could get down to just a few
degrees.
Within a couple of degrees .
The big thing is that you have to stop your yaw
rates, and then sit there and look outside for
awhile and see which way you're going, straight
ahead or sideways . If you are going sideways
you rotate around for awhil e and stop the rate
and then look out again. Ri ght? I felt you could
get the thing ca ged quite well. We. didn ' t do it
BEF at all, did we? We never did cage in BEF.

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.