Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

51
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
White
That ' s right . The way that the thing was set
up , we could sure monitor it because we knew
it was going to vent without being on the
gage . I think they compromised the whole
system so we could monitor it .
As a matter of fact, we monitored it very
thoroughly and spent about 100 times as much
time on t his SJs t em as we should have . John
Young ' s been complaining about this point,
and I think that it ' s a very poor thing. They
ought to dig up the money and put a gage in
there that will do the job . Very strong
point . The quantity measuring system,I thought,
was all right.
I thought it was pretty good . I thought it
was excellent as a matter of fact . It was a
very readable gage ,. It had tremendous scal e
on it, but, shoot, you could read the thing to
a percent . I don't know why it was a:ny more
readable than the other ones, but I thought it
was pretty good.
The flow rates--I don't have a:ny particular
comment on that . I thought the flow rate on
N4sl-f.1Dfl~T1Aw

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.