Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

' McDivitt
White
McDivitt
on a great deal of time also. I think you had
your faceplate closed a little more than I
did . There at the end we were both going to an
open-faceplate and open- gloves all the way .
Yes, we were especially going open-faceplate
at the end just to see if we could jack up
the humidity. I actually preferred to have
my faceplate closed, as opposed to having it open.
I went ahead and left it open trying to get
the humidity up . We never really did get it
up over 60 percent. That seemed to be where
it was going to stay.
We were happy to see that the CO2 sensor
gage stayed down low the whole flight . It
would pop up any time we turned the o High ·
2
Rate on and go up to a pretty high reading,
and then settle back down to zero. I didn't
notice any particular discomfort versus day
versus night .
No, as a matter of fact, I didn't either. We
took some temperature readings on the cabin
window frame and they varied by about 6 or
8 , 10 degrees at the very most .

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.