Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

41
McDivitt
White
down so the pressure woul d remai n down below
960 . They initially told us to vent it to keep
it at 930 to 960 . Then they told us to vent it
on down to about 890. From then on, we vented
it down in the neighborhood of between 890 and
93, depending upon who was asleep and who wasn't
asleep. It sure seemed to be an unsatisfactory
solution to two problems--one of the cabin hold
ing at a higher pressure than they wanted it to
on GT- 3 and also the problem of the o system
2
venting outside of the pressure gage . In the
oxygen system I think the solution to putting
the venting down at 967 was a poor solution to
the problem of having a poorly designed ga ge .
I think the gage was agai n poorly designed and
it should be designed to read about 1200 pounds.
Rel ief should be up in that area .
I f they really went ahead and jacked down the
relief pressure, to get it on the gage, I think
that is one heck of an approach to an engineer
ing problem.
I think that ' s a gross thing to do and if they
did that deliberatel y, I thi nk they deserve a

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.