Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

  • p. 6 …4 Flight Plan Changes ....................... .. .......... 250 13. 5 Systems ............................................... 254 14.0 TRAINING 14.1 Gemini Mission…
  • p. 265 …The things that were characteristic of Gemini 4 were being incor porated in the simulator down…
237
to look at until 8 : 00 o'clock the night before the
flight . Consequently , we didn't have a l ot of
time to go through them the way we should have. We
should have had these books and charts in our hands
no later than two weeks before the flight . Here
again there were some extenuating circumstance, but
I 'm not sure that the circumstances were really that
great . I still think that we should have gotten
these out earlier. The people down at the Cape
doing these things worked themselves to the bone
night and da1,practically , to get these things done.
I have nothing but ~he highest praise for the people
from FCSD that came down to do this job , I just
sort of suspect that we should have gotten started
on it earlier and that maybe we should have had a few
more people down there doing it . Any comment on
this, F.d?
White No. This is the thing that I think I was harping
about a long time before the flight, because I saw
the same thing happen on GT-3 ,when the checklist
came in at the last minute . In fact, the last
night before the flight, I remember John walking down
the hall looking at hie flight plan and his check
list and commenting on this surprise and that

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.