Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

209
McDi vitt
White
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
White
I agree. Okay. Do you have anything else?
That horizon isn't very good on the daylight side,
either.
No, the horizon isn't very good on the daylight side.
The horizon's not very good anywhere, really.
We ' ll go more into that on D-9.
You could see the lights of the attitude thrusters,
and it didn't seem to make any difference which ones
you were firing at night. They weren't blinding
by any stretch of the imagination.
They looked like lightening maybe. Little flashes ·.
The attitude thrusters lit up the sky a little
but not a great amount. They weren't blinding either.
Not much to say about that. Okay. I want you to
discuss '· adapter separation that you saw .
Okay . On the adapter separation, Jim and I agreed
to separate the electric and the OAMS, and then
pause between the adapter separation so that we
could dwell a little bit on the separation and
absorb as much as we could about it. When it did
separate, we got a very clean feeling of separation
between the t wo and a very definite feeling that
the adapter and the spacecraft had separated .
There wasn ' t much question in my mind. Was there
much in yours, Jim? ~
..i-O~~FIDE~fftAt ••

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.