Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

  • p. 156 …We were still pointed well out in advance . The only clue that we were over El…
  • p. 158 …We were still pointed well out in advance . The only clue t hat we were o…
  • p. 255 …advance. ·Then you know exactly what information you' re • going t o take up on the…
  • p. 266 …It was the only way that we could actually work on the storage of the pieces…
155
McDi·.rit t
with the limited knowledge t~at we had of the
targ0·I; ·.3 I felt that acquisiti.on and tracking of
the targf,b'1 w· , ::J a lot ,,>::i,:,:j_.~r than I had tho-.i.ght
it was going to be . I guess thats
I all.
The next target that we had was Ywna Tnternatinna1
Airpo:d . Here again we had a tar.get that ·,1::i.::;
not a very prol'.linent lal'ld.nri.rk . The time of
closest apprJach and acquisitio·:1 time and the
aiming 1.1ngles were adequate . It gave m,1 a good
idea of what I should be looking f,:n- a,..'1d 1,hen I
should be looking. I used the same maps again ;
I used the cutout of a WAC Chart plus a great
big world c~'lart . 'I1here was qui t0 a
discontinuity in the s0ul ~ of these two maps ,
but I I m not really sure that we co·..1ldn I t have
done t:'le job wlth just those two . I think tnat
what we probably needed was a world map that
showed a little more detail and a WAC Chart
that showed a little bit more area. What we
prob 01bly coul::l. ha"e used most of all was a
phot,:>grap1', rif ~~'le ar =1a . As I came in across
the Califoraia coast. I )icked np the Salton
Sea and El Centro , just below the Sal ton Sea,
and then I mew that, Yuma was on the Colorado
(!l@)NflDEl'JTLll

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.