Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

  • p. 156 …We were still pointed well out in advance . The only clue that we were over El…
  • p. 158 …We were still pointed well out in advance . The only clue t hat we were o…
  • p. 255 …advance. ·Then you know exactly what information you' re • going t o take up on the…
  • p. 266 …It was the only way that we could actually work on the storage of the pieces…
154
But I did get a good indication of the cap9.bili.ty
to tt'ack a target anci to pick a target up , and
I think tha~ I was quite surprised 4t the ease
at which you could track . I also concurt'ed with
Ji:n 1 s conclusion that a goo,l prominent landmar.k
primer, preferabl;f a body of W9.ter somewhere to
nail do·,m your target, is the most desirablA
f eature . I also feel that an important thing
that the next crew going up could do would be
to spend a lot of t.ime on jnst pla.Ln map study
fr the 30 degrees north to 30 degrees sou.th,
and try to p·L•::k up the prominent f ,~:1t:.2res to
permit them to become quickly adjusted to what
they can see and what they can I t see d·own
below. I think that a 1-i.;;tle concentrated map
study prior to the flight woulci help a lot with
the D- 6. Also a concentrated study on the
targets themselves wo·..lld be quite beneficial .
This is s~rmething that we really never got to
do. The original 243 ~argets were too voluminous
even to ~onsider time to atudy each one, and
when we got the final 19 targets, it was pretty
late in the flight to be working on ::xi
exp-::riment that wasn ' t even on our flight. Even
C1"Jt~FIDEl>~ TIA1
~

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.