Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

  • p. 156 …We were still pointed well out in advance . The only clue that we were over El…
  • p. 158 …We were still pointed well out in advance . The only clue t hat we were o…
  • p. 255 …advance. ·Then you know exactly what information you' re • going t o take up on the…
  • p. 266 …It was the only way that we could actually work on the storage of the pieces…
139
White
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
of the flight. we had the darned OAMS thrusters
going so much-- BANt-, BANG , BANG , BANG , BANG!
I was just too hot some of the time .
Yes .
Early in the flight the ammonia fumes kept me
awake . The first time I tried to go to sleep they
kept me awake .
I don't even lmow if they kept me awake .
I really noticed it then .
I think we really need a s leep period longer than
the four-hour s l eep period. First of all we always
fooled around and never really got the sleep that
we wanted . If we had gotten a four-hour sleep
period everytime it was scheduled, we would have
been in great shape . I think we ought to schedule
a longer one on the order of six hours . Ed and I
talked about this earlier . What I suggested is
that we schedule four six-hour sleep periods ,if
there aren't a lot of experiments that have to be
done together . Where two of these sleep periods
come together, you can make that a dual awake time
so that the people could be up. As a matter of
fac~ you could modify it in such a way that if you

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.