Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

112 g?t 1~18 Et fFt,-,L
White
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
White
McDivi tt
White
McDivitt
Whi te
McDivitt
Well, you really need- -elapsed
time. If we had elapsed time- -
If we had a good elapsed timer onboard the space
craft, I would say that there ' s no doubt about it .
Elapsed time.
I think we ought to start working on it right
now .
Elapsed time is the way we should go . I don ' t
t hink that with the timing systems we 've got
available for the Gemini that we want to go to
elapsed time for the whole mission .
Trying to get our data back from this f l ight is
going to be a horrible mess because of those two
timing systems .
I know it . I agree. Before we lai.mched , we knew
that we wanted to run it in elapsed time , and
there wasn ' t any doub't about it .
I think maybe if we make the point str ong enough
maybe they ' l l get busy on it .
You ' re right . l,,J,e'll get going on it .
Okay , why don ' t you take the checklist cards , Jim?
The checklist cards . We had two complete sets of
car ds that were broken up into t wo groups . We
Qt@ tffl4f11D8JWA L

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.