Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

  • p. 6 …0 MISSION CONTROL 13.1 GO/NO GO ' s ............. .. .............. .... ........... 249 13 . 2 PLA and CLA Updates…
  • p. 92 86 McDivitt White McDivitt and near the end of the mission, we were down to 12…
  • p. 257 249 13.0 MISSION CONTROL 13.1 GO/NO GO 's McDivitt Okay. Mission Control. Mission…
  • p. 262 …Mission Control System. I think the Mission Control on this flight was nothing short of excellent…
  • p. 263 …0 TRAINING 14.1 Gemini Mission Simulator McDivitt Okay. Over on Training now. The first topic…
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
107
that ' s keeping your hack-¼t's easy to mistake for
your minute hand. The way the face is marked it ' s
difficult to read the minutes out . The hours
interfere with each other. The whole readability
of the clock is unsatisfactory and the readability
of the hands is unsatisfactory. SQ I think the
clock is out in all counts as far as I ' m concerned.
I kept watching Jim's clock over there and I think
I could get a better Greenwich Mean Time off of
his clock than I could on mine on my side of the
instrument panel.
Hey, let me comment on mine . I thought the reada
bility of t hat Accutron 24-hour clock was excellent.
The accuracy of it was lousy. It lost four or
or f ive seconds every day or more . I reset it
about every 24 hours. My Omega wrist wat ch that
I had set on GMT never lost a second, except I
forgot to wind it one day, and it ran down . It
stopped. Ha, ha!
I was guilty of the same thing.
But the Accutron clock on my side of the instru
ment panel, that they put on as sort of an
afterthought, was indeed a fine clock as far as

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.