Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

  • p. 6 …0 MISSION CONTROL 13.1 GO/NO GO ' s ............. .. .............. .... ........... 249 13 . 2 PLA and CLA Updates…
  • p. 92 86 McDivitt White McDivitt and near the end of the mission, we were down to 12…
  • p. 257 249 13.0 MISSION CONTROL 13.1 GO/NO GO 's McDivitt Okay. Mission Control. Mission…
  • p. 262 …Mission Control System. I think the Mission Control on this flight was nothing short of excellent…
  • p. 263 …0 TRAINING 14.1 Gemini Mission Simulator McDivitt Okay. Over on Training now. The first topic…
McDivitt
White
a little marginal in some cases . I had no diffi
culty in reading the des i gnations on the switch
breaker panels. I think they were lighted ade
quately also. I'm not going to say they're
lighted well , because I don ' t think the lighting
is real good in the spacecraft. The water
management panel isn ' t lighted properl y . I ' m
not sure we reall y have to have it l i ghted too
well . The utility lights, I t hink,as they are
now.,are very close to being useless . It's like
taking a match and trying to use it to find your
way around . It doesn ' t provide enough light .
From time to time I would have liked to have had
a light which had a little stronger output of
light available,~ so that I coul d-- I several times
wanted to look behind my seat for things at night
and I ' d like to look down into the area in the
water management panel light.
Yes , I think probably the wattage on those bulbs
should go up an order of magnitude to make them
effective.
You use it so seldom that it wouldn ' t be a big
power use. You ' d only use it when you needed it ,

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.