Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part II, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 290 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part II of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing, prepared by NASA's Spacecraft Operations Branch, Flight Crew Support Division, and dated June 18, 1965. The debriefing began aboard the recovery ship USS Wasp and ended at the Manned Spacecraft Center. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White discuss how the spacecraft systems performed, including the platform, OAMS, RCS and control modes. They also cover operational checks, visual sightings, experiments, mission planning and training, and give recommendations for future crews.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part II) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Part II of this document contains the “Visual Sightings” section of the debriefing (pages 196-224), where astronauts James McDivitt and Edward White describe their observations while aboard the spacecraft.

98
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
White
could make the readings . I think you could put
spot lights in there and not get by that prob
lem.
That's exactly what I was going to say . Lights
aren't going to solve that problem .
No, it's just plain bright outside. When you look
back in, even though you have your lights on, it's
fairly dark inside . I personally wasn ' t troubled
by this very many times during the flight . Were
you , Jim?
No, I wasn ' t.
I didn't feel that was too bad . S~ actually, I
felt that the lighting , although not abundant ,
was adequate. I think the actual light ing of the
instruments would certainly be nicer if we had
individual instruments lit up. Oh, ene thing -
several times I would like to have had a flash
Eght in there, something where I could direct a
real beam of light. The little side light& I
thought, were close to being useless . I didn' t
use my little side light, the auxiliary light ,
very much at all.
As a matter of fact , I didn ' t either .
Very seldom . I think that if we're going to have
•Gl>J~LOiMIWs.

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 290 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.