Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part I, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 340 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part I of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing. The Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division prepared it on June 16, 1965, from recordings of the debriefing held aboard the USS Wasp on June 9, 1965. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White describe the mission from an operational viewpoint, covering countdown, powered flight, insertion, orbital operations, reentry, landing and recovery. According to the preface, visual sightings were left for a later part.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Astronaut Ed White recounts seeing “sparkles” during the flight.

  • p. 149 …I did notice that the suit was a little harder. I felt this type of suit…
  • p. 150 …You mean with the harder suit I was stiffer? Harder . And your. arms were stiffe:::- a…
  • p. 186 178 €0NflDENitM White McDivitt White McDivitt any harder . No . I think that shouli be t he…
  • p. 318 …We hit ten times harder than I expected to hit . The altimeter was set at the…
  • p. 320 …We really seemed to hit hard, harder than I thought EO~ ◄ Flt,Et~TI.A"L
199
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
CUNFIDl:~L
mission , exclusively. It was very accurate . You
could check the times in the plotboard as against
what you saw on the ground and you could locate
yourself quite adequately . How about you?
While I ' m thinking about it, I thought the plot
board information early in the flight was excellent .
But I thought t hat the plotboard i nformation at t he
end of the flight was not correct . As a matter of
fact , I started ~o call them a couple of times , but
I never did . By the time I would get the stuff
plotted , and get the map put where I wanted it , we
would be someplace else . I ' m sure that that in
format i on they were sending up to me wasn't right ;
I ' d be off an orbit or two .
After about the last day and a half, I used the
nominal orbit plot maps exclusively . I could see
the time and the location . I could spot it
right with the ground . And I think I figured it
was seven minutes behind near the l atter part of
the mission . This didn't bother me . I could tell
how far it was behind, and then update my position
on the map quite easi l y . I thought those pre- plots
were real good .
So did I . I t hought they were , too . But I was a
OONFIBENTIAL,

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 340 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.