Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part I, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 340 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part I of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing. The Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division prepared it on June 16, 1965, from recordings of the debriefing held aboard the USS Wasp on June 9, 1965. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White describe the mission from an operational viewpoint, covering countdown, powered flight, insertion, orbital operations, reentry, landing and recovery. According to the preface, visual sightings were left for a later part.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Astronaut Ed White recounts seeing “sparkles” during the flight.

  • p. 149 …I did notice that the suit was a little harder. I felt this type of suit…
  • p. 150 …You mean with the harder suit I was stiffer? Harder . And your. arms were stiffe:::- a…
  • p. 186 178 €0NflDENitM White McDivitt White McDivitt any harder . No . I think that shouli be t he…
  • p. 318 …We hit ten times harder than I expected to hit . The altimeter was set at the…
  • p. 320 …We really seemed to hit hard, harder than I thought EO~ ◄ Flt,Et~TI.A"L
17707 COt~ft0ENftAL
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
White
McDivitt
we !leeded to close the hatch , just as we sat
there and said we might need during the SAR
of thfl spacecraft in St . Louis. I think the
attachrnl'9nts of the bat' and the cable to the
spacecraft sho~ld probably be at least doubled
in strength , so there just isn 't any question
in the pilots' minds or the engineers' minds .
I guess the eng:ineers were co::winced that
you didn ' t have Jim and I co!'lvinced that those
tw~ attachme!lt points-- .
We've seen it break too many times, I think .
We've broken the bar and we've broken that
atta::)hn:ent point. I ha::!. actually physically
twisted the attachmen t right off the spacecraft
up in the zero-g airplane. I certainly wouldn't
have put my full strength into it if I knew
my life depended on that attachment. It should
be ma.de absolutely foolproof.
Well , that was t l,'.e point I was trying to make
earlier when I said I was pulling as hard as
I could . Then I said that I really wasn't
pulling as hard as I was capable of.
You did::1 1 t have confidence in that attachment.
I didn't really think that I shouln p~ll O!l it

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 340 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.