Documents / Official release

Preliminary Gemini 4 Crew Debriefing, Part I, 1965

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1965-06-09 · 340 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a preliminary transcript of Part I of the Gemini 4 (GT-4) flight crew debriefing. The Spacecraft Operations Branch of NASA's Flight Crew Support Division prepared it on June 16, 1965, from recordings of the debriefing held aboard the USS Wasp on June 9, 1965. In it, astronauts McDivitt and White describe the mission from an operational viewpoint, covering countdown, powered flight, insertion, orbital operations, reentry, landing and recovery. According to the preface, visual sightings were left for a later part.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 Incident: 6/9/65, North Atlantic Ocean. This document is a preliminary transcript (Part I) derived from voice recordings of the Gemini 4 flight crew debriefing taken aboard the recovery ship, USS Wasp, on June 9, 1965. Astronaut Ed White recounts seeing “sparkles” during the flight.

  • p. 149 …I did notice that the suit was a little harder. I felt this type of suit…
  • p. 150 …You mean with the harder suit I was stiffer? Harder . And your. arms were stiffe:::- a…
  • p. 186 178 €0NflDENitM White McDivitt White McDivitt any harder . No . I think that shouli be t he…
  • p. 318 …We hit ten times harder than I expected to hit . The altimeter was set at the…
  • p. 320 …We really seemed to hit hard, harder than I thought EO~ ◄ Flt,Et~TI.A"L
175
McDivitt
White
assembly of i terns you wa.---it to have ....--you ought to
look into the glove area a little more thoro'.lg'hly
anii try to get a piece of a glo-re ·,1ith so:ne
type of a surface that will give us some heat
protection and gives us a high sensitivlty of
feel through it . The big conclusions , the final
co~~lusions , that I ' d like to draw are that EVA
can be made a normal routine operation if the
following modificatio~s are made to the space
craft :
1 . The highest priority is that the spring back
there on the gain lug has convicted itself
and I don't believe that that's a good design.
There should be s:>me way ths.t either the l ub
ricatio:?1 is :nA.de foolproof or the spring mH.de
stronger .
I think what we really want to say here is that
the locking mechanism is inadequate as it is ,
compl etely inadequate . Until i t is fixed , I
think we should take it easy.
Th11.t 1 s right . I think we almost had a bad experi
m:,e with ths.t gain thing . We knew about it ahead
of ti.me . We thought we had it fixed, but it ' s
not fixed . I think it convicted itself and it's
,oMftOf:NllAL

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 340 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.