Documents / Official release

Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1962 · 216 pages · text from the file's own layer

This NASA file of astronaut scientific debriefing papers from 1962 collects internal Office of Space Sciences material on the science observations made on early Mercury flights. A February 1962 memo from Maurice Dubin asks for more detail on John Glenn's report of luminous particles and the atmospheric horizon layer. A draft memo concludes that the particles were tied to the spacecraft and were not extraterrestrial. The file also holds a Los Alamos letter that attributes the high haze layer to nitrogen peroxide, and notes on Carpenter's airglow observations.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This file contains memoranda, correspondence, reports, and other materials relating to contemporary scientific interest in investigating the nature of luminous phenomena reported by astronauts John Glenn and Walter Schirra during spaceflight. This collection includes transcripts from NASA interviews and debriefings with both astronauts regarding those observations. It also contains details relating to scientific observations of atmospheric phenomena, including brief descriptions of luminous particles, experiences while aboard spacecraft, and circa 1955 theoretical analysis of meteoric particles entering the atmosphere. Pages 34-35, 55-56, 57-63, 64-113, and 122-127 feature content relevant to the PURSUE initiative.

Open the PDF at page 55 Original source ↗

“Cooper”51 pages

  • p. 64 …J Cooper: No. If I had no prev;ous experience on the light·, I don Vt…
  • p. 65 …because you ha~ e , as background'l Cooper: I think possibly so~ Of course it's…
  • p. 66 …F,.. ~ ...,, ., , - • I • l •, • 'I- - • •~ -, • ' , was? ,. • -,-~ ;' _·•: ... .,~ '-.. .. - Cooper:. I Just don't have any idea. I kept doubting…
  • p. 67 …ghtning par'tfcularly in that area. .: • '.o:. Cooper: · Well, · this is .,one possibility· that there was…
  • p. 68 Scientific Debriefing -5- Cooper: The moon was probably 14-al. It was down to about a…
  • p. 69 I' .' Scientific Debriefing -6- Cooper: Well, not realq. As I went into both night sides I…
  • p. 70 Scientific Debriefing -1- Cooper: .Almost. Almost as it began to get dark. Of course it gets…
  • p. 72 …Probably about 30 degrees G Cooper: I had a ~-:few comments that I made · on the…
  • p. 73 Scientific Debriefing Cooper: Just once. Bill Armstrong: Did you do it twice or Just once? ·'.1…
  • p. 74 ,. • I Scientific Debriefing • -ll- Cooper: I think so. I think with that brightness~ if you know…
  • p. 75 …I • l • .' • . ~ l • • . •. • - ' ' Cooper: Yeso Bill: That 1s one of t he main things we wanted…
  • p. 76 . Scientific Debriefing -13- Cooper: Those deploy marks worked real well. They were excellent for getting in…
  • p. 77 …Did you make attempts to see it· on the day side'l Cooper: I sure did…
  • p. 78 …Did .you see the ·stars during this• ~'l , I Cooper: Not this particular ··orbit. No I…
  • p. 79 …the · center of' the window? Cooper: Noo More slight¥ to the le:f't of' the…
  • p. 80 ',' I Scientific Debriefing -17- I Cooper: Maybe as long as a minute. I doubt if it…
  • p. 81 ,. 1' ' Scientific Debriefing -J.8- Cooper: Yes, it got dimmer. Mercer: Cou1d you see _lights of…
  • p. 82 Scientific Debriefing -19- Cooper: ~finite~: The ideal would be a series of lights. A better combination…
  • p. 83 I i ' I Scientific Debriefing -20- Cooper: You 're going to have to be right on…
  • p. 85 …Is this maneuver an expensive and troublesome· thing to do'l Cooper: It takes control power…
  • p. 86 …worked •very well. ' • And the lens opening of 5.6? 'Cooper: ·It was exactly-on ·what…
  • p. 87 …aey more information? There was none in the tra.ns9ript. ~ Cooper: What base was this oni…
  • p. 88 Scientific Debri efing -25- ( Cooper continued) ·a brown look, Everything predominantly had a. bluish cast . .All…
  • p. 89 Scientific Debriefing Cooper: I could not see distinct lightning patterns. It ju,st all lit ~• . I…
  • p. 90 Scientific Debriefing -27- Cooper: No. I noticed several large cyclonics. I did not notice any very…
  • p. 91 …Was the horizon always ·a sharp line? Cooper: Yes, day and 'night the hqrizon was sharp…
  • p. 92 …Which is darker, the earth or the 11ttl.e band of sky? Cooper: When there was…
  • p. 93 …Does the earth appear as blue to your eye , , as it does in the photos? Cooper…
  • p. 94 …You could see the griton\ the window? • Cooper : You could see the light actually impinging on…
  • p. 95 …More like a patch? Cooper: Smoother. It was a good sized area. • Roach: You didn't…
  • p. 96 …We are interested in horizon effect after sunset • . \' (Cooper draws some more pict~es.) Cooper: You…
  • p. 97 …Did you 'notice this was cone shaped? Cooper: A little bit cone shaped. J Roach : Did…
  • p. 98 …I Cooper : Sunset is more of a golden orange. Dr. Voas : Did you notice any of…
  • p. 99 …Then, is there some structure above the blue layer? Cooper: I never could see pattern structure…
  • p. 100 …What are your attitude tolerances •in ASCS? Cooper: I would say within about 5 l/2…
  • p. 101 …was the camera easy to use'l Cooper: Yes, after I once got it out of…
  • p. 102 …Di"d you place it vertically? Where did you place it? Cooper: I placed it vertically…
  • p. 103 …That is all I had. ' Cooper : Did you get anything at all? Warren : Particul.a.rly…
  • p. 104 …Were you listening for it at the time'l Cooper: Yes, except I had my visor…
  • p. 105 …Over the Himalayas, shot number 12, was the green true? Cooper: Yes, fairly true. Shepard : I…
  • p. 106 …Did you see any distinct shadows from the terrai!n? Mountains? l t .Cooper: •Yes. You…
  • p. 107 …O'Keefe: .Did you see anything that looked like a crater? ! I Cooper: No. I sure…
  • p. 108 …Did they actually seem to curve in? Cooper: If I would be sitting facing this way…
  • p. 109 …the smoke? Cooper : was bl~ Hanel: Hanel: in polar Cooper: an airplane. ·clouds Hanel: pictures? Cooper…
  • p. 110 …Question: · Did you see any dust storms? Cooper: At no time· did I note a dust…
  • p. 111 …I Cooper: No. I think this was purely a feeling of the straps. You're floating…
  • p. 112 …Did you see ,Calcutta? I Cooper: No. Fisher : Did you see any airports? Cooper : Ye~, I…
  • p. 113 …Could you hear better? Cooper : No. \ Dr. voas: Did you at any time hear an unusual…
  • p. 183 …it should have been (capped) ooo Gordon Cooper knows this and will have a cap on…
  • p. 184 …Schirra - Cooper will have this very same type of li ght meter. Nordberg - You know why…
  • p. 196 …Schirra = I feel at this point, for example, in Cooper 0 s flight , what we are…
In reply refer to: SGC:ML:ml
21 February 1962
MEMORANDUM
Subject: Possible Scientific Visual Information
Obtained by J. H. Glenn
1. Two (2) interesting observations were reported in the Press,
as described by Colonel Glenn during the MA-6 flight. It is of
vital interest to obtain a more detailed description of these observa
tions in order that the accuracy and the details of what was observed
may be properly recorded for scientific evaluation. The two obser
vations were:
(a) The report of the great number of luminous particles
apparently travelling with the spacecraft at Friendship-7 sunrise;
and
(b) The altitudes or angular view of the upper limb
of the atmosphere.
2. The thousands of luminous particles were described as
travelling with the spacecraft. It is important that Glenn describe
in detail precisely the observational characteristics under 'Which he
saw the particles in order to obtain an estimate of the brightness
of these particles. The questions that we would like answered are
what was the basis of Glenn's determination~ that the particles
were actua.lly travelling with the spacecraft and 'Whether this condi
tion persisted on subsequent orbits. In addition, the geometry of
the observations should be further described in order to derive the
geometric distribution of the particles relative to the spacecraft's
window. (The precise observational time and the position of sun
light luminosity can readily be determined from the orbit of the
spacecraft itself). These particles may be geocentric in origin
and may be suspended in the atmosphere. There are at least two
hypothesis for explaining particles travelling with the spacecraft.
The intensity compared to starlight should be determined also as
this information is of importance in determining further information
about the absolute number and cross-sections of the particles and may
relate to the dust content of zodiacal light as well as the gegen
schein.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 216 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.