Documents / Official release

Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1962 · 216 pages · text from the file's own layer

This NASA file of astronaut scientific debriefing papers from 1962 collects internal Office of Space Sciences material on the science observations made on early Mercury flights. A February 1962 memo from Maurice Dubin asks for more detail on John Glenn's report of luminous particles and the atmospheric horizon layer. A draft memo concludes that the particles were tied to the spacecraft and were not extraterrestrial. The file also holds a Los Alamos letter that attributes the high haze layer to nitrogen peroxide, and notes on Carpenter's airglow observations.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This file contains memoranda, correspondence, reports, and other materials relating to contemporary scientific interest in investigating the nature of luminous phenomena reported by astronauts John Glenn and Walter Schirra during spaceflight. This collection includes transcripts from NASA interviews and debriefings with both astronauts regarding those observations. It also contains details relating to scientific observations of atmospheric phenomena, including brief descriptions of luminous particles, experiences while aboard spacecraft, and circa 1955 theoretical analysis of meteoric particles entering the atmosphere. Pages 34-35, 55-56, 57-63, 64-113, and 122-127 feature content relevant to the PURSUE initiative.

  • p. 68 …up just at t1:ie .last part c,f the ~n1Jtrt. ·It-was never ·close to…
  • p. 77 …I never saw it then• . Armstrong: It should ·have been closer on the dey side than…
  • p. 84 …I passed right over the vicinity of Los Angeles and San Diego and never saw them…
  • p. 96 …You never tire of looking at the sunsets. As the sun begins to get downI towards…
  • p. 99 …I never could see pattern structure above that. It is really not black. This is any…
  • p. 108 …I never realized that before just now. But it seemed to be almost full when it…
  • p. 109 …You never took two pictures of the same a~ea? That is, two overlapping '·. Yes, I…
  • p. 111 …I never had trouble handling pencil. I never had any trouble putting it where I wanted…
  • p. 123 …third stage and since then we have never had any troubleo Schirra - Sure p that's…
  • p. 146 …I told them to correc t it an d they never did . But anyway this is…
  • p. 163 …This was my prediction that I would turn i t of f and never turn it…
  • p. 167 …Tennyson - Is it correct then that this window of ours (Vicor window) has .never really been…
  • p. 168 …It wasn't Aldebaran, that ' s for sure. • Dubin - You say that you never saw your…
  • p. 175 …I know, you probably never went over snow or ice. Schirra - I looked up at the…
  • p. 176 …I have never had that opportunity, and I don't know that anybody ever will. Tennyson…
  • p. 180 …I never did have the
  • p. 181 …I have never seen this possibility discussed. Of course it also goes with the fact that…
  • p. 184 …Shoemaker - And how about Australia? Were you over there during daytime at all? Schirra - No, never…
  • p. 186 …Gill - You never would see it then. Shoemaker - In photographs I've seen from previous flights…
  • p. 188 …ill - You never saw any large view of water then? In other wor ds, you didn…
  • p. 192 …Dubin - And so you never saw any? Schirra - So I suspect that you have to see…
  • p. 199 …That 0 s how I satisfied myself I never would even though they had a beautiful…
  • p. 201 …and it "sailed pendent of the spacecraft. never could get _Scientists here b~lieve the again…
LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY. ' .. UNIVERSITY OP' CALll"ORNIA
. . l.09 ALAMO., NIEW MUICO
TO: Dr. Jocelyn Gill -10
- DATI: July 13, 1962
field they saw, or to compare the intensity and color changes noted with that
thru an absorbing cell containing N02 • • 'Ihe required thickness is readily availabl.e.
Acknowledgments
The author has benefited greatly from discussions with several associates,
especially as regards references to sources of upper atmospheric .and photochemical
data.
Dr. Robert Sherman has assisted in location of data on the absorption cross
section of N02 • Dr. Arthur Cox suggested a number of references and confirmed the
author's belief that reasonably accurate photometric observations could be made on
photographs of a star field. Dr. Ieston Miller has emphasized the importance of
even crude control of the wavelengths responsible for exposure. All of the men
mentioned ·above are members of the Los Alamos Scientific Iaboratory.
Dr. J. A. 0' Keefe of the Theoretical Division of the Goddard Space Flight Center
generously discussed the observations of J. Glenn and S. Carpenter, and my hypo
thesis regarding N02 absorption. He has referred me to the excellent articl.es in
"'Ille F.a.rth as a Planet" and encouraged my submission of this letter.
Future Work
I would, of course, be interested in your opinion, and that of other experts in
the field, of the above hypothesis. If your group recommends inclusion of such
J observations on a future flight, we may be ·able to help on some points in data
acquisition. I am sure the project would deserve review and .control by a panel
of men such as Bates and Nicolet.--- ..........
Respectfully submitted,
~y--~
BOB E. WATI'
Assoc. J-Div. Ldr.BEW:jo and Grp • .Ldr. J-16Distribution:
l - Dr. Jocelyn Gill. .I
'

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 216 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.