Documents / Official release
Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963
National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1962 · 216 pages · text from the file's own layer
This NASA file of astronaut scientific debriefing papers from 1962 collects internal Office of Space Sciences material on the science observations made on early Mercury flights. A February 1962 memo from Maurice Dubin asks for more detail on John Glenn's report of luminous particles and the atmospheric horizon layer. A draft memo concludes that the particles were tied to the spacecraft and were not extraterrestrial. The file also holds a Los Alamos letter that attributes the high haze layer to nitrogen peroxide, and notes on Carpenter's airglow observations.
From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This file contains memoranda, correspondence, reports, and other materials relating to contemporary scientific interest in investigating the nature of luminous phenomena reported by astronauts John Glenn and Walter Schirra during spaceflight. This collection includes transcripts from NASA interviews and debriefings with both astronauts regarding those observations. It also contains details relating to scientific observations of atmospheric phenomena, including brief descriptions of luminous particles, experiences while aboard spacecraft, and circa 1955 theoretical analysis of meteoric particles entering the atmosphere. Pages 34-35, 55-56, 57-63, 64-113, and 122-127 feature content relevant to the PURSUE initiative.
“Cooper”51 pages
- p. 64 …J
Cooper: No. If I had no prev;ous experience on the light·, I don Vt…
- p. 65 …because you ha~ e ,
as background'l
Cooper: I think possibly so~ Of course it's…
- p. 66 …F,.. ~ ...,,
., , - • I • l •, • 'I- - • •~ -, • '
, was? ,. • -,-~ ;' _·•:
...
.,~ '-.. ..
-
Cooper:. I Just don't have any idea. I kept doubting…
- p. 67 …ghtning
par'tfcularly in that area. .: • '.o:.
Cooper: · Well, · this is .,one possibility· that there was…
- p. 68 Scientific Debriefing -5-
Cooper: The moon was probably 14-al. It was down to about a…
- p. 69 I'
.'
Scientific Debriefing -6-
Cooper: Well, not realq. As I went into both night sides I…
- p. 70 Scientific Debriefing -1-
Cooper: .Almost. Almost as it began to get dark. Of course it gets…
- p. 72 …Probably about 30 degrees G
Cooper: I had a ~-:few comments that I made · on the…
- p. 73 Scientific Debriefing
Cooper: Just once.
Bill Armstrong: Did you do it twice or Just once?
·'.1…
- p. 74 ,. • I
Scientific Debriefing • -ll-
Cooper: I think so. I think with that brightness~ if you know…
- p. 75 …I • l • .' • . ~ l • • . •. • -
' '
Cooper: Yeso
Bill: That 1s one of t he main things we wanted…
- p. 76 .
Scientific Debriefing -13-
Cooper: Those deploy marks worked real well. They were excellent for getting
in…
- p. 77 …Did you make attempts to see it· on the day side'l
Cooper: I sure did…
- p. 78 …Did .you see the ·stars during this• ~'l
, I
Cooper: Not this particular ··orbit. No I…
- p. 79 …the · center of' the window?
Cooper: Noo More slight¥ to the le:f't of' the…
- p. 80 ',' I
Scientific Debriefing -17-
I
Cooper: Maybe as long as a minute. I doubt if it…
- p. 81 ,.
1' ' Scientific Debriefing -J.8-
Cooper: Yes, it got dimmer.
Mercer: Cou1d you see _lights of…
- p. 82 Scientific Debriefing -19-
Cooper: ~finite~: The ideal would be a series of lights. A better
combination…
- p. 83 I
i '
I
Scientific Debriefing -20-
Cooper: You 're going to have to be right on…
- p. 85 …Is this maneuver an expensive and troublesome· thing to do'l
Cooper: It takes control power…
- p. 86 …worked •very well.
' •
And the lens opening of 5.6?
'Cooper: ·It was exactly-on ·what…
- p. 87 …aey more information? There was none in the tra.ns9ript.
~ Cooper: What base was this oni…
- p. 88 Scientific Debri efing -25-
( Cooper continued) ·a brown look, Everything predominantly had a. bluish
cast . .All…
- p. 89 Scientific Debriefing
Cooper: I could not see distinct lightning patterns. It ju,st all lit ~•
. I…
- p. 90 Scientific Debriefing -27-
Cooper: No. I noticed several large cyclonics. I did not notice any very…
- p. 91 …Was the horizon always ·a sharp line?
Cooper: Yes, day and 'night the hqrizon was sharp…
- p. 92 …Which is darker, the earth
or the 11ttl.e band of sky?
Cooper: When there was…
- p. 93 …Does the earth appear as blue to your eye , ,
as it does in the photos?
Cooper…
- p. 94 …You could see the griton\ the window?
• Cooper : You could see the light actually impinging on…
- p. 95 …More like a patch?
Cooper: Smoother. It was a good sized area. •
Roach: You didn't…
- p. 96 …We are interested in horizon effect after sunset •
. \'
(Cooper draws some more pict~es.)
Cooper: You…
- p. 97 …Did you 'notice this was cone shaped?
Cooper: A little bit cone shaped. J
Roach : Did…
- p. 98 …I
Cooper : Sunset is more of a golden orange.
Dr. Voas : Did you notice any of…
- p. 99 …Then, is there some structure above the blue layer?
Cooper: I never could see pattern structure…
- p. 100 …What are your attitude tolerances •in ASCS?
Cooper: I would say within about 5 l/2…
- p. 101 …was the camera easy to use'l
Cooper: Yes, after I once got it out of…
- p. 102 …Di"d you place it vertically? Where did you place it?
Cooper: I placed it vertically…
- p. 103 …That is all I had. '
Cooper : Did you get anything at all?
Warren : Particul.a.rly…
- p. 104 …Were you listening for it at the time'l
Cooper: Yes, except I had my visor…
- p. 105 …Over the Himalayas, shot number 12, was the green true?
Cooper: Yes, fairly true.
Shepard : I…
- p. 106 …Did you see any distinct shadows from the terrai!n? Mountains?
l
t .Cooper: •Yes. You…
- p. 107 …O'Keefe: .Did you see anything that looked like a crater?
!
I
Cooper: No. I sure…
- p. 108 …Did they actually seem
to curve in?
Cooper: If I would be sitting facing this way…
- p. 109 …the smoke?
Cooper :
was bl~
Hanel:
Hanel:
in polar
Cooper:
an airplane.
·clouds
Hanel:
pictures?
Cooper…
- p. 110 …Question: · Did you see any dust storms?
Cooper: At no time· did I note a dust…
- p. 111 …I
Cooper: No. I think this was purely a feeling of the straps. You're floating…
- p. 112 …Did you see ,Calcutta? I
Cooper: No.
Fisher : Did you see any airports?
Cooper : Ye~, I…
- p. 113 …Could you hear better?
Cooper : No. \
Dr. voas: Did you at any time hear an unusual…
- p. 183 …it should have been
(capped) ooo Gordon Cooper knows this and will have a cap on…
- p. 184 …Schirra - Cooper will have this very same type of li ght meter.
Nordberg - You know why…
- p. 196 …Schirra = I feel at this point, for example, in Cooper 0 s flight , what
we are…
68
on the axis which is easily the equivalent of 800 million candle
poweroo osingle flare on the ground ooo
Schirra - uh - huh --
O'Keefe - Well, I think 2 or 3 million is the biggest thing they
ever tried to use o So the directed beam has quite a big advantage
over the undirected beam, if people ' s orbital work is good enough .
Schirra - Agreedo Our problem of course, is unless we have the win d0w ,
meaning, of course, attitude, fairly vertical in relation to the
surface of the earth, you can ' t take advantage of this. This i s j ust
the confined attitude that we 0 ve been flying ino ••o
Shoemaker - I think this bears on another question that was
submitted. I might read it and find out what else we can add to it.
The ph otographs of terrain were not successful. Some of the trouble
was obviously due to cloud cover, and some of the film was over
exposed . Can you comment further on this, and do you have any
suggestions for successful terrain ph6tography on future flights?
Schirra - Yes, I do o I used a BIWI automatic light meter which is
still ideal for the job 9 and again we were not briefed carefully
enough on the BIWI automatic, and if I' had this to do again, I
would get the manufacturer from BIWI to come down. In fact, many
things I 've talked about for equipment, I would not ever -- I said
this years before this flight, but while on the programo.oif I needed
some information on the capsule, I would not feel adverse to callin g
Mr. McD onell (McDonnell Aircraft) down, as an exampleo I f I had a
BIWI exposure meter, I would like to have Mr. BIWI or whoe ver is
Not linked to a story yet.
About this file
Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 216 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.