Documents / Official release

Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1962 · 216 pages · text from the file's own layer

This NASA file of astronaut scientific debriefing papers from 1962 collects internal Office of Space Sciences material on the science observations made on early Mercury flights. A February 1962 memo from Maurice Dubin asks for more detail on John Glenn's report of luminous particles and the atmospheric horizon layer. A draft memo concludes that the particles were tied to the spacecraft and were not extraterrestrial. The file also holds a Los Alamos letter that attributes the high haze layer to nitrogen peroxide, and notes on Carpenter's airglow observations.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This file contains memoranda, correspondence, reports, and other materials relating to contemporary scientific interest in investigating the nature of luminous phenomena reported by astronauts John Glenn and Walter Schirra during spaceflight. This collection includes transcripts from NASA interviews and debriefings with both astronauts regarding those observations. It also contains details relating to scientific observations of atmospheric phenomena, including brief descriptions of luminous particles, experiences while aboard spacecraft, and circa 1955 theoretical analysis of meteoric particles entering the atmosphere. Pages 34-35, 55-56, 57-63, 64-113, and 122-127 feature content relevant to the PURSUE initiative.

  • p. 68 …up just at t1:ie .last part c,f the ~n1Jtrt. ·It-was never ·close to…
  • p. 77 …I never saw it then• . Armstrong: It should ·have been closer on the dey side than…
  • p. 84 …I passed right over the vicinity of Los Angeles and San Diego and never saw them…
  • p. 96 …You never tire of looking at the sunsets. As the sun begins to get downI towards…
  • p. 99 …I never could see pattern structure above that. It is really not black. This is any…
  • p. 108 …I never realized that before just now. But it seemed to be almost full when it…
  • p. 109 …You never took two pictures of the same a~ea? That is, two overlapping '·. Yes, I…
  • p. 111 …I never had trouble handling pencil. I never had any trouble putting it where I wanted…
  • p. 123 …third stage and since then we have never had any troubleo Schirra - Sure p that's…
  • p. 146 …I told them to correc t it an d they never did . But anyway this is…
  • p. 163 …This was my prediction that I would turn i t of f and never turn it…
  • p. 167 …Tennyson - Is it correct then that this window of ours (Vicor window) has .never really been…
  • p. 168 …It wasn't Aldebaran, that ' s for sure. • Dubin - You say that you never saw your…
  • p. 175 …I know, you probably never went over snow or ice. Schirra - I looked up at the…
  • p. 176 …I have never had that opportunity, and I don't know that anybody ever will. Tennyson…
  • p. 180 …I never did have the
  • p. 181 …I have never seen this possibility discussed. Of course it also goes with the fact that…
  • p. 184 …Shoemaker - And how about Australia? Were you over there during daytime at all? Schirra - No, never…
  • p. 186 …Gill - You never would see it then. Shoemaker - In photographs I've seen from previous flights…
  • p. 188 …ill - You never saw any large view of water then? In other wor ds, you didn…
  • p. 192 …Dubin - And so you never saw any? Schirra - So I suspect that you have to see…
  • p. 199 …That 0 s how I satisfied myself I never would even though they had a beautiful…
  • p. 201 …and it "sailed pendent of the spacecraft. never could get _Scientists here b~lieve the again…
67
opportunity to see a highway, for example, and trace it,
because I wasn't over those populated areas such as the Southern
United States long enough or had the clear weather to just
sit there and observe them. In contrast, I think what you
would do if you saw something and wanted to look at it, I
think what you would do is that you would pitch down more - to
look almost straight down and see it which Scott had the capability
of doing and he could really take a careful look at it.
O'Keefe - One curious fact that I haven't seen anybody take
advantage of is this. It is quite common in triangulation -
that two stations which are a couple of hundred miles apart, or
a hundred miles apart, and that therefore as far apart as you are
from the ground and along a light path which is much inferior -
it's nearly parallel to the earth. In order for one of those
stations to see the other one - to measure on it - they provide
one of them with a 6-inch heliotrope, that's enough. That means
that somebody on the ground with a six-inch heliotrope who knew
how to point could point a light that you could see even in the
daytime if they had a dark background; and conversely, if you had
a heliotrope, you could also be seen from the ground. I have never
seen this possibility discussed. Of course it also goes with the
fact that instead of these tremendous flares, if they knew how to
point, they could make a much stronger light where you are with a
search light.
Schirra - Sure . . ..
O' Keefe - The army 5- foot searchlight gives 800 million candles

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 216 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.