Documents / Official release

Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1962 · 216 pages · text from the file's own layer

This NASA file of astronaut scientific debriefing papers from 1962 collects internal Office of Space Sciences material on the science observations made on early Mercury flights. A February 1962 memo from Maurice Dubin asks for more detail on John Glenn's report of luminous particles and the atmospheric horizon layer. A draft memo concludes that the particles were tied to the spacecraft and were not extraterrestrial. The file also holds a Los Alamos letter that attributes the high haze layer to nitrogen peroxide, and notes on Carpenter's airglow observations.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This file contains memoranda, correspondence, reports, and other materials relating to contemporary scientific interest in investigating the nature of luminous phenomena reported by astronauts John Glenn and Walter Schirra during spaceflight. This collection includes transcripts from NASA interviews and debriefings with both astronauts regarding those observations. It also contains details relating to scientific observations of atmospheric phenomena, including brief descriptions of luminous particles, experiences while aboard spacecraft, and circa 1955 theoretical analysis of meteoric particles entering the atmosphere. Pages 34-35, 55-56, 57-63, 64-113, and 122-127 feature content relevant to the PURSUE initiative.

  • p. 94 …Is it a smooth overall gray on the window? Do you see any chance at a…
  • p. 99 …This is not a real sharply defined - - - There is a little blue gray going thru this…
  • p. 145 …Sort of Brownish gray - rathe r it was n ' t black or white. It was definitely…
  • p. 146 …Sort of like a tattle tale b rown instead of a t attle tale gray. Cameron…
  • p. 171 …got and you d~fferentiate colors by grays, blacks, whites, but there is no doubt in…
42
Schirra - I don't think they are in this area. We have to expand
this star chart . Now if I were yawed around 90 degrees, this star
chart is absolutely worthless because this only goes a plus or
minus 60 degrees .
O' Keefe = I know, I know .. .
Sch i rra = Maybe I could have 0 00
o °Keefe = But, your flight path did go over Aldebaran, Orion -
the plane of the orbit.
Schirra - As I recall , and my memory of course, is suffering
from the time span (which has elapsed since the flight on October ~ .5-,.
1962 . ) As I recall, Orion was on the daylight s i de, you see it's . ..
Roman = As I say, I was going to say that Orion was actually very
late = just before dawn - if it were up at all.
Schirra = Physically it was impossible to see - here is the constella
tion Orion way down here ~ in time, this is on my daylight side .
Roman = I would think that Aldebaran would be much the same problem.
Cameron = Just the same thing .
Schirra = It is right in this same family, of course.
Roman = What time of night was this? Can you give me any idea
of the distance between sunlight and sunset?
Schirra = That vs why I am perfectly convinced that I could not
possibly see anything associated with the constellation Orion or
Aldebaran . With this star chart, Nancy, what we do is have a
time margin . (Looking at the chart .) Now Orion down here is
actually in my local daylight . It just was impossible for me to
see it at this point way back here . It was occluded frank ly by the

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 216 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.