Documents / Official release
Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963
National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1962 · 216 pages · text from the file's own layer
This NASA file of astronaut scientific debriefing papers from 1962 collects internal Office of Space Sciences material on the science observations made on early Mercury flights. A February 1962 memo from Maurice Dubin asks for more detail on John Glenn's report of luminous particles and the atmospheric horizon layer. A draft memo concludes that the particles were tied to the spacecraft and were not extraterrestrial. The file also holds a Los Alamos letter that attributes the high haze layer to nitrogen peroxide, and notes on Carpenter's airglow observations.
From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This file contains memoranda, correspondence, reports, and other materials relating to contemporary scientific interest in investigating the nature of luminous phenomena reported by astronauts John Glenn and Walter Schirra during spaceflight. This collection includes transcripts from NASA interviews and debriefings with both astronauts regarding those observations. It also contains details relating to scientific observations of atmospheric phenomena, including brief descriptions of luminous particles, experiences while aboard spacecraft, and circa 1955 theoretical analysis of meteoric particles entering the atmosphere. Pages 34-35, 55-56, 57-63, 64-113, and 122-127 feature content relevant to the PURSUE initiative.
“Cooper”51 pages
- p. 64 …J
Cooper: No. If I had no prev;ous experience on the light·, I don Vt…
- p. 65 …because you ha~ e ,
as background'l
Cooper: I think possibly so~ Of course it's…
- p. 66 …F,.. ~ ...,,
., , - • I • l •, • 'I- - • •~ -, • '
, was? ,. • -,-~ ;' _·•:
...
.,~ '-.. ..
-
Cooper:. I Just don't have any idea. I kept doubting…
- p. 67 …ghtning
par'tfcularly in that area. .: • '.o:.
Cooper: · Well, · this is .,one possibility· that there was…
- p. 68 Scientific Debriefing -5-
Cooper: The moon was probably 14-al. It was down to about a…
- p. 69 I'
.'
Scientific Debriefing -6-
Cooper: Well, not realq. As I went into both night sides I…
- p. 70 Scientific Debriefing -1-
Cooper: .Almost. Almost as it began to get dark. Of course it gets…
- p. 72 …Probably about 30 degrees G
Cooper: I had a ~-:few comments that I made · on the…
- p. 73 Scientific Debriefing
Cooper: Just once.
Bill Armstrong: Did you do it twice or Just once?
·'.1…
- p. 74 ,. • I
Scientific Debriefing • -ll-
Cooper: I think so. I think with that brightness~ if you know…
- p. 75 …I • l • .' • . ~ l • • . •. • -
' '
Cooper: Yeso
Bill: That 1s one of t he main things we wanted…
- p. 76 .
Scientific Debriefing -13-
Cooper: Those deploy marks worked real well. They were excellent for getting
in…
- p. 77 …Did you make attempts to see it· on the day side'l
Cooper: I sure did…
- p. 78 …Did .you see the ·stars during this• ~'l
, I
Cooper: Not this particular ··orbit. No I…
- p. 79 …the · center of' the window?
Cooper: Noo More slight¥ to the le:f't of' the…
- p. 80 ',' I
Scientific Debriefing -17-
I
Cooper: Maybe as long as a minute. I doubt if it…
- p. 81 ,.
1' ' Scientific Debriefing -J.8-
Cooper: Yes, it got dimmer.
Mercer: Cou1d you see _lights of…
- p. 82 Scientific Debriefing -19-
Cooper: ~finite~: The ideal would be a series of lights. A better
combination…
- p. 83 I
i '
I
Scientific Debriefing -20-
Cooper: You 're going to have to be right on…
- p. 85 …Is this maneuver an expensive and troublesome· thing to do'l
Cooper: It takes control power…
- p. 86 …worked •very well.
' •
And the lens opening of 5.6?
'Cooper: ·It was exactly-on ·what…
- p. 87 …aey more information? There was none in the tra.ns9ript.
~ Cooper: What base was this oni…
- p. 88 Scientific Debri efing -25-
( Cooper continued) ·a brown look, Everything predominantly had a. bluish
cast . .All…
- p. 89 Scientific Debriefing
Cooper: I could not see distinct lightning patterns. It ju,st all lit ~•
. I…
- p. 90 Scientific Debriefing -27-
Cooper: No. I noticed several large cyclonics. I did not notice any very…
- p. 91 …Was the horizon always ·a sharp line?
Cooper: Yes, day and 'night the hqrizon was sharp…
- p. 92 …Which is darker, the earth
or the 11ttl.e band of sky?
Cooper: When there was…
- p. 93 …Does the earth appear as blue to your eye , ,
as it does in the photos?
Cooper…
- p. 94 …You could see the griton\ the window?
• Cooper : You could see the light actually impinging on…
- p. 95 …More like a patch?
Cooper: Smoother. It was a good sized area. •
Roach: You didn't…
- p. 96 …We are interested in horizon effect after sunset •
. \'
(Cooper draws some more pict~es.)
Cooper: You…
- p. 97 …Did you 'notice this was cone shaped?
Cooper: A little bit cone shaped. J
Roach : Did…
- p. 98 …I
Cooper : Sunset is more of a golden orange.
Dr. Voas : Did you notice any of…
- p. 99 …Then, is there some structure above the blue layer?
Cooper: I never could see pattern structure…
- p. 100 …What are your attitude tolerances •in ASCS?
Cooper: I would say within about 5 l/2…
- p. 101 …was the camera easy to use'l
Cooper: Yes, after I once got it out of…
- p. 102 …Di"d you place it vertically? Where did you place it?
Cooper: I placed it vertically…
- p. 103 …That is all I had. '
Cooper : Did you get anything at all?
Warren : Particul.a.rly…
- p. 104 …Were you listening for it at the time'l
Cooper: Yes, except I had my visor…
- p. 105 …Over the Himalayas, shot number 12, was the green true?
Cooper: Yes, fairly true.
Shepard : I…
- p. 106 …Did you see any distinct shadows from the terrai!n? Mountains?
l
t .Cooper: •Yes. You…
- p. 107 …O'Keefe: .Did you see anything that looked like a crater?
!
I
Cooper: No. I sure…
- p. 108 …Did they actually seem
to curve in?
Cooper: If I would be sitting facing this way…
- p. 109 …the smoke?
Cooper :
was bl~
Hanel:
Hanel:
in polar
Cooper:
an airplane.
·clouds
Hanel:
pictures?
Cooper…
- p. 110 …Question: · Did you see any dust storms?
Cooper: At no time· did I note a dust…
- p. 111 …I
Cooper: No. I think this was purely a feeling of the straps. You're floating…
- p. 112 …Did you see ,Calcutta? I
Cooper: No.
Fisher : Did you see any airports?
Cooper : Ye~, I…
- p. 113 …Could you hear better?
Cooper : No. \
Dr. voas: Did you at any time hear an unusual…
- p. 183 …it should have been
(capped) ooo Gordon Cooper knows this and will have a cap on…
- p. 184 …Schirra - Cooper will have this very same type of li ght meter.
Nordberg - You know why…
- p. 196 …Schirra = I feel at this point, for example, in Cooper 0 s flight , what
we are…
25
we are going to see a batch of clouds if it's lighted. (the
earth) That's really what I saw a lot of. I was just amazed.
Obviously, when I flew over Africa, it was loud and · clear and
you would see this if you were looking at Africa from some
vantage point many, many miles away. I suspect that if you
looked at earth from a long distance away that there is so much
cloud cover that it might have an appearance much like Venus in
this sense.
Shoemaker - While we are on Africa, would you like to go on
and talk about the ... (interruption)
Schirra - You can't match my blues. Maybe Parish · could help ..•
Nordberg - Does anyone have anything on the altitude, parti cular
ly on that top that sort of turbulent thing?
Schirra - That's another one you should check into. Through
the trajectory tables, you should find my altitude. Now at
this point, I was just passed Indian Ocean ship as I recall.
O'Keefe - We've done all that. If you say when Mercury went
through that we will tell you what the height was. (To
Cameron) You have it?
Cameron - I have it. It's about 280 kilometers ~ Height of
the layers is about 66 kilometers. I only know the height
of his observation, not knowing the width of it,
O'Keefe - (to Schirra) But you made a mark when you went
through it, The first "time hack" was when you weTe going
through this turbulent area, right?
Not linked to a story yet.
About this file
Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 216 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.