Documents / Official release

Astronaut Scientific Debriefings, 1962-1963

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1962 · 216 pages · text from the file's own layer

This NASA file of astronaut scientific debriefing papers from 1962 collects internal Office of Space Sciences material on the science observations made on early Mercury flights. A February 1962 memo from Maurice Dubin asks for more detail on John Glenn's report of luminous particles and the atmospheric horizon layer. A draft memo concludes that the particles were tied to the spacecraft and were not extraterrestrial. The file also holds a Los Alamos letter that attributes the high haze layer to nitrogen peroxide, and notes on Carpenter's airglow observations.

From the source:Release of 2026-06-12 This file contains memoranda, correspondence, reports, and other materials relating to contemporary scientific interest in investigating the nature of luminous phenomena reported by astronauts John Glenn and Walter Schirra during spaceflight. This collection includes transcripts from NASA interviews and debriefings with both astronauts regarding those observations. It also contains details relating to scientific observations of atmospheric phenomena, including brief descriptions of luminous particles, experiences while aboard spacecraft, and circa 1955 theoretical analysis of meteoric particles entering the atmosphere. Pages 34-35, 55-56, 57-63, 64-113, and 122-127 feature content relevant to the PURSUE initiative.

  • p. 68 …up just at t1:ie .last part c,f the ~n1Jtrt. ·It-was never ·close to…
  • p. 77 …I never saw it then• . Armstrong: It should ·have been closer on the dey side than…
  • p. 84 …I passed right over the vicinity of Los Angeles and San Diego and never saw them…
  • p. 96 …You never tire of looking at the sunsets. As the sun begins to get downI towards…
  • p. 99 …I never could see pattern structure above that. It is really not black. This is any…
  • p. 108 …I never realized that before just now. But it seemed to be almost full when it…
  • p. 109 …You never took two pictures of the same a~ea? That is, two overlapping '·. Yes, I…
  • p. 111 …I never had trouble handling pencil. I never had any trouble putting it where I wanted…
  • p. 123 …third stage and since then we have never had any troubleo Schirra - Sure p that's…
  • p. 146 …I told them to correc t it an d they never did . But anyway this is…
  • p. 163 …This was my prediction that I would turn i t of f and never turn it…
  • p. 167 …Tennyson - Is it correct then that this window of ours (Vicor window) has .never really been…
  • p. 168 …It wasn't Aldebaran, that ' s for sure. • Dubin - You say that you never saw your…
  • p. 175 …I know, you probably never went over snow or ice. Schirra - I looked up at the…
  • p. 176 …I have never had that opportunity, and I don't know that anybody ever will. Tennyson…
  • p. 180 …I never did have the
  • p. 181 …I have never seen this possibility discussed. Of course it also goes with the fact that…
  • p. 184 …Shoemaker - And how about Australia? Were you over there during daytime at all? Schirra - No, never…
  • p. 186 …Gill - You never would see it then. Shoemaker - In photographs I've seen from previous flights…
  • p. 188 …ill - You never saw any large view of water then? In other wor ds, you didn…
  • p. 192 …Dubin - And so you never saw any? Schirra - So I suspect that you have to see…
  • p. 199 …That 0 s how I satisfied myself I never would even though they had a beautiful…
  • p. 201 …and it "sailed pendent of the spacecraft. never could get _Scientists here b~lieve the again…
J
'•
'• srientif ic Debriefing -48-
1 1
··Pf. Voao: • You seemed to have the general impression that you w~re stationary
.~
8:fld everything else is moving.
~
Cpoper: That's right. You sort of become the center of everytijing, and you think
t
hpw you can move the earth around, 'When you want it, rather than move yourself.
Dr.
I
Voao: Now, as you sat there with this moving picture in front of you, did you
\
have the general feeling you were sitting upright or flying on your back?
Cooper: I did very distinctly feel I was sitting upright. A couple of times
on account of the way you fee_l in the straps like hanging upside down. Every
ti.me I dropped something, I grabbed at it below. I never had trouble handling
pencil. I never had any trouble putting it where I wanted or getting it. One
ti.me I made a wild grab for the · camera as I thought it was going to fall, but of
course it didn't.
Dr. Voas: On periods af'ter you awakened, did you__ have· ·reeling you had gone to
sleep sitting upright?
Cooper: Yes. Definitely.
Dr. Voao: You mentioned sometimes you had the feeling of being upside down. Was
this correlated with the spacecraf't being inverted? Visually, I mean.
I
Cooper: No. I think this was purely a feeling of the straps. You're floating
in the straps rather than being firm; like inverted flight in an aircraf't.
Voas: Did you have ~, general feeling of being stationary? This general feeling
of being stationary was not changed by any control action?
Cooper: I tried to give them some pretty good rates, but bad no feel for rates at all.
Cooper: Vision-wise, you would see things changing ou then pretty fast, but it
wasn't bothersome at all.
Dr. Voas: When you say "pretty good rates," this is 2 to 3 degrees per second?
Cooper: Three, four or five degrees.
' '
. . ·.
... ..... ...

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 216 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.