Documents / Official release

AAWSAP DIRD, MHD Air Breathing Propulsion and Power for Aerospace Applications, November 2010

U.S. Department of War · 2010-11-21 · 32 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, dated 21 November 2010, was prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency's Defense Warning Office under its Advanced Aerospace Weapons System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It reviews propulsion concepts that use weakly ionized plasmas and magnetohydrodynamics for hypersonic flight and spacecraft. It concludes that the Ajax MHD energy bypass concept is meaningless below Mach 12. A reverse energy bypass with a Virtual Cowl is judged potentially practical, and electric propulsion is expected to become standard for spacecraft.

From the source: Release of 2026-09-18 Incident: 11/21/10, Las Vegas, Nevada. Released with redactions. This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD surveys magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) and plasma-based concepts for air-breathing propulsion, onboard power generation, and aerodynamic control, arguing that such systems could in principle extend aerospace performance beyond the limits of conventional chemical propulsion and control surfaces. The report reviews concepts including MHD acceleration, flow control, inlet control, onboard power generation, drag reduction, and plasma-generated “virtual” aerodynamic surfaces, while giving particular attention to hypersonic applications such as scramjet power extraction, reentry vehicles, global-strike gliders, and aero-assisted orbital maneuvers. However, it emphasizes major practical constraints, especially extreme power requirements, system weight and complexity, and the difficulty of achieving useful ionization in colder air at lower hypersonic speeds; on that basis, it argues that Ajax-style MHD bypass concepts, in which energy is extracted from the airflow upstream and reintroduced downstream through an electromagnetic system, are not meaningful below about Mach 12, while treating the “virtual cowl” and related reentry applications as more plausible. The document presents plasma and MHD aerospace systems as a technically serious but highly demanding field whose nearer-term promise lies in specialized hypersonic control, power generation, and reentry applications rather than a fully realized air-breathing propulsion system.

UNCLASSIFIED/ /POR. OPPl@IAL ~SI! OHL¥
nontrivial) of the coupled physical and chemical processes in those plasmas can
potentially lead to their better understanding and help them become practical.
ELECTRIC PROPULSION SYSTEMS
Electric propulsion thrusters can be divided into three categories: electrothermal,
electrostatic, and electromagnetic. First, electrothermal thrusters use electric
energy to directly heat the propellant and add enthalpy. The heated gas is then
accelerated using a conventional converging-diverging gas-dynamic nozzle.
Second, electrostatic thrusters use applied static electric fields to accelerate
propellant ions via body forces. Third, electromagnetic thrusters use
electromagnetic body forces (ExB) to accelerate a plasma (positive and negative
charges). An electric propulsion system consists of a power source (e.g., solar or
nuclear), power conditioning electronics, engine/thruster (including inlet for air
breathing systems), and fuel/propellant storage and feed subsystem.
Energy can be obtained from sunlight, a nuclear reactor, or chemical sources. In
the case of solar electric propulsion (SEP), solar photons are converted into
electricity by solar cells. The energy could also be beamed to the vehicle using
laser or microwave sources. Beaming the power allows for higher power
densities but with the added complications of needing a power station and a
means of getting the power to the vehicle (direct illumination or via a relay
system). In nuclear electric propulsion (NEP), thermal energy from the nuclear
reactor is converted into electricity by either a static or dynamic thermal-to
electric power conversion system. Static systems have the advantage of no
moving parts for high reliability, but they have low efficiency; dynamic systems
have moving parts (e.g., turbines and generators) and do not scale well for small
systems, but they do have higher efficiency. Other onboard energy storage
systems such as high-density capacitors, flywheels, or fuel cells could be used.
Power conditioning systems are required to convert the power system voltage to
the form required by the electric thruster. For example, an SEP power system
produces low-voltage DC (typically ~l00V); this would need to be converted (via
transformers, etc.) to kilovolt levels for use in an ion thruster. The power
conditioning system is often referred to as the power processing unit (PPU); this
is, in turn, part of the vehicle's overall power management and distribution
(PMAD) subsystem.
Various combinations of thruster and propellant are possible, depending on the
specific application. The propellant or working fluid can be either stored on board
and used in a rocket mode or collected from the atmosphere in an air-breathing
mode. The natural system-level trade between these propellant methods is
fuel/propellant mass versus power system mass. Air-breathing systems require
less propellant mass but require higher energies to perform similar missions.
Although rockets will operate in a space or air environment, t heir thrust
durations are limited by the amount of propellant that can be carried.
Key performance parameters determine the relative strengths and weaknesses
of different propulsion technologies. The fuel/propellant efficiency is
characterized by the specific impulse (Isp) for rockets and by the thrust-specific
fuel-consumption (TSFC) for air-breathing systems. It is a measure of how much
UNCLASSIFIED}liOA OFFl&IPdE W&E 8HLY
5

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 32 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.