AAWSAP DIRD, Cockpits in the Era of Breakthrough Flight, November 2010

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, dated 1 November 2010 and numbered DIA-08-1011-002, was prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency's Defense Warning Office. It is one of a series of advanced technology reports produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications program. It draws mainly on the book Frontiers of Propulsion Science and speculates about breakthroughs such as control of gravity and inertia and faster-than-light travel. It then proposes a provisional cockpit design with six-degree-of-freedom controls, virtual displays and no windows.

From the source:Release of 2026-09-18 Incident: 11/1/10, Las Vegas, Nevada. Released with redactions. This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD examines how cockpit design might change if future aerospace vehicles were ever to achieve major propulsion breakthroughs such as control over gravity and inertia, “propellantless” flight, or faster-than-light travel. The report does not describe an existing or emerging vehicle class. Instead, it asks what such hypothetical capabilities would mean for piloting, displays, controls, and human factors, and it argues that the biggest design challenges would come from full six-degree-of-freedom motion, operation across multiple flight regimes from near-surface flight to orbit and deep space, and the possible separation between the craft’s actual motion and the crew’s internal physical sensations. It combines those assumptions with established human-machine-interface principles and with maturing inputs such as gesture, voice, and brain-machine control to outline a provisional cockpit centered on intuitive displays, stress-tolerant physical controls, and a virtual surround display.

UNCLASSIFIED/ fFOR OFFI@IAI:: HSE OPtl::Y
• Woods (1993) .
36 Five References apply:
• Bass, L. & Dewan, P. (Eds.). (1993) .
• Elm, W. C. & Woods, D. D. (1985) .
• Johannesen, L. & Woods, D. D. (1991).
• Potter, S. S. & Woods, D. D. (1991).
• Potter, S. S. et al. (1992) .
37 Grifantini, (2010)
38 Two references apply:
• Oran, Daniel. (1991). Apply Psychology to Product Design. Machine Design. Nov. 7, 37-40 .
• Stokes, Wickens, & Kite, K. (1990).
39 Woods (1984).
40 Thee references apply:
• Stokes, Wickens, & Kite, K. (1990).
• Sarter, N. & Woods, D. (1992)
• Woods (1993) .
41 Degani & Wiener (1990).
42 Hall, Kenji. (2007).
43 Two references apply:
• Cohen, A. & Chen, E. (1999). Six Degree-of-Freedom HAPTIC System as a Desktop Virtual Prototyping
Interface, Cambridge, MA: SensAble Technologies, Retrieved from

• Van der Vaart, A. J. M. (1995). Arm movements in operating rotary controls (Doctoral dissertation) .
Techniche Universiteit Delft, Netherlands, Del~se Univ. Pres.
44 Four references apply:
• Hall, Kenji. (2007).
• Pavlovic', V. I., Sharma, R. & Huang, T. S. (1997) . Visual Interpretation of Hand Gestures for Human
Computer Interaction : A Review . In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19,
677- 695
• Sutter, J. D. (2010).
• Underkoffler, J. (2010).
45 Morgan, B. ( 1985). DOD enlists voice control and expert systems. Electronic Products, Oct. 1, 65 -67.
46 Genik (2009)
47 Coombes, L. F. E. (2005). Control In The Sky: The Evolution and History of The Aircraft Cockpit, Pen & Sword
Aviation : Leo Cooper Limited.
48 Proffitt, D. & Kauiser, M. (1991) . Observer Properties for Understanding Dynamical Displays: Capacities,
Limitations, and Defaults. NASA TM 102812. Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.
49 Coombes (2005).
50 Grifantini (2010).
51 Multiple possibilities:
• SO Great Examples of Data Visualization. (2009)
• McCandless (2009).
• Shneiderman, B. (1997).
• Tu~e, E. (1991) .
• (VUE). (2008).
52 Van der Vaart (1995).
UNCLASSIFIED/fFOA. OFFICIO ls. Plili Olhlls.¥
52