Documents / Official release
This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, dated 1 November 2010 and numbered DIA-08-1011-002, was prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency's Defense Warning Office. It is one of a series of advanced technology reports produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications program. It draws mainly on the book Frontiers of Propulsion Science and speculates about breakthroughs such as control of gravity and inertia and faster-than-light travel. It then proposes a provisional cockpit design with six-degree-of-freedom controls, virtual displays and no windows.
From the source:Release of 2026-09-18 Incident: 11/1/10, Las Vegas, Nevada. Released with redactions. This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD examines how cockpit design might change if future aerospace vehicles were ever to achieve major propulsion breakthroughs such as control over gravity and inertia, “propellantless” flight, or faster-than-light travel. The report does not describe an existing or emerging vehicle class. Instead, it asks what such hypothetical capabilities would mean for piloting, displays, controls, and human factors, and it argues that the biggest design challenges would come from full six-degree-of-freedom motion, operation across multiple flight regimes from near-surface flight to orbit and deep space, and the possible separation between the craft’s actual motion and the crew’s internal physical sensations. It combines those assumptions with established human-machine-interface principles and with maturing inputs such as gesture, voice, and brain-machine control to outline a provisional cockpit centered on intuitive displays, stress-tolerant physical controls, and a virtual surround display.
“The Advance”12 pages
UNCLASSIFIED/ fFOR OFFI@IAI:: HSE OPtl::Y Excerpt (15 pg) NASA and Kallsman Instrument Corporation (Syosset, NY) discuss how stellar charts change over distances traveled and address Doppler shihs. • Oran, Daniel. (1991). Apply Psychology to Product Design. Machine Design. Nov. 7, 37- 40. Article (4 pg) Illustrates how to use different switch locations, groupings, and shapes to more readily convey functions. • Pavlovic', V. I., Sharma, R. & Huang, T. S. (1997) . Visual Interpretation of Hand Gestures for Human Computer Interaction : A Review . In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19, 677- 695 Article (36 pgs) Summarizes recent progress toward using gestures of the arms and hands to interact with computers. Hand gestures, including those with different finger positions, can be used. These features are likely to mature soon into commercial products. • Russo, D., Tillman, B., & Pickett, L. (2009). Human Factors Engineering Standards at NASA, Presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Conference (22-26 Sep. 2008, Manhattan, NY) . NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston TX. Quoting Abstract : "NASA has begun a new approach to human factors design standards. For years NASA STD-3000, Manned Systems Integration Standards, has been a source of human factors design guidance for space systems. In order to better meet the needs of the system developers, NASA is revising its human factors standards system. NASA-STD-3000 will be replaced by two documents: set of broad human systems design standards (including both human factors and medical topics) and a human factors design handbook. At the present time the standards document is in final review with some disagreement on several critical issues. The handbook is progressing with November 2008 as the anticipated completion date." • Potter, S. S. & Woods, D. D. (1991). Event Driven Timeline Displays: Beyond Message Lists in Human Intelligent System Interaction. In Conference Proceedings 1991 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1283-1288. Article (6 pg) Examines lessons and trends of fault monitoring, suggesting that timelines of events be visually conveyed, incl uding causal connections. • Potter, S. S. et al. (1992). Visualization of Dynamic Processes: Function -Based Displays for Human Intelligent System Interaction. In Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1283- 1288. Article (6 pg) Although in the context of monitoring processes, it suggests that visual models of the processes (instead of alphanumeric displays) are crucial. • Proffitt, D. & Kauiser, M. (1991). Observer Properties for Understanding Dynamical Displays: Capacities, Limitations, and Defaults . NASA TM 102812. Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA. Report (15 pg) Examined human ability to understand and predict motion in the display of dynamic systems. They found that both physics- educated people and naive people perform about equally on the intuitive level: particle motion is relatively accurate, but rotational kinematics, especially that concerning moments of inertia, is relatively poor. • Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press . Book (316 pg) By examining major accidents, the correlation between psychology and the operation of hazardous technologies is described. As such, it presents a wealth of lessons of mistakes to avoid. • Sarter, N. & Woods, D. (1992) . Mode error in supervisory control of automated systems . In Proceeding of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting. Atlanta GA, Oct. Report (5 pg) Illustrates and defines mode error: "When an action entirely appropriate for a situation is performed, except that this is not the current situation." - Norman 1981. Describes how systems that have command sequences, which change their pattern in different operating modes, is a problem . • Seifert, H. (Ed) . (1959). Space Technology. New York, NY : Wiley & Sons . UNCLASSIFIED/fFOA. OFFICIO ls. Plili Olhlls.¥ 47
Not linked to a story yet.
Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 57 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.