Documents / Official release

AAWSAP DIRD, Laser Lightcraft Nanosatellites, November 2010

U.S. Department of War · 2010-11-01 · 77 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIA-08-1011-001), dated 1 November 2010, was prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency's Defense Warning Office under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications program. It covers nanosatellite technologies, laser Lightcraft propulsion, a weapon mission selection study and a multi-megawatt laser study. The author recommends that the Department of Defense, working with NASA, bring laser Lightcraft propulsion research back to the United States and restart the Air Force X-50LR test flight program.

From the source:Release of 2026-09-18 Incident: 11/1/10, Las Vegas, Nevada. Released with redactions. This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD examines laser-propelled “Lightcraft” as a possible low-cost method to launch very small satellites into low Earth orbit by using a remote high-energy laser to supply most of the propulsion energy rather than relying entirely on onboard energy sources. The report combines a survey of nanosatellite trends with a review of “Lightcraft” propulsion concepts, vehicle design, beam-control requirements, and mission studies, and argues that the most promising application is the launch of nano- or pico-satellites, especially Earth- and space-observing payloads of a few kilograms or less. It presents the concept as potentially much cheaper than conventional multistage rockets for very small payloads, while also noting significant practical constraints including strict beam-riding geometry, atmospheric losses, demanding pointing and adaptive-optics requirements, and heavy dependence on large ground-, sea-, or air-based laser infrastructure. Overall, the document presents laser “Lightcraft” as a technically plausible launch concept whose attractiveness depends on whether the supporting laser and beam-control system can be made reliable and economical at operational scale.

  • p. 8 …The sensor must be capable of detecting Earth over a range of orbital radii with a…
  • p. 17 …For the purpose of this report, we envision a Lightcraft Earth-to-Orbit (ETO) transportation system…
  • p. 23 …kg, and 1.0 kg into low Earth orbit (LEO). And preliminary life-cycle cost estimates…
  • p. 34 …not only placing nanosats into LEO at low cost (Figure 14 ), but also for performing much…
  • p. 42 …Each picosat is gravity gradient stable, has a dipole array facing Earth, and a broader beam…
  • p. 43 …orrlCIAE USE 014Lf pushbroom scanning mode for complete Earth coverage rather than only sampling coverage. The…
  • p. 72 …The system is single-stage-to-orbit and completely reusable with no onboard propellant required (the…
  • p. 75 …J., et al. (1991), "System Requirements for Low-Earth-Orbit Launch Using Laser Propulsion," in Proc…
UNCLASSIFIED/;'POR: OPPICIAE USE 014Lf
spacecraft. This creates coherent RF or optical apertures that are essentially unlimited
in size, which could offer unprecedented high-resolution radiometry, hyperspectral
imaging, radar, and RF interception (for mapping, surveying, MASINT, SIGNIT), etc.
Launching laser-propelled Lightcraft nano-/pico-satellites to LEO requires megawatt
class lasers. TEXTRON Systems Corporation's proposed 10 MW electron gun-driven
CO2/gas mixture laser is a multi-megawatt-class system that can be implemented now
because this technology requires little or no additional R&D. This system offers realistic
near-term, low-cost Lightcraft launch capability. However, this system is large,
requires a large amount of gas propellant to fuel the laser, and the system
infrastructure will cost over $200 million.
The newly emergent bulk slab solid-state, high-power fiber, and free-electron laser
technologies being explored by the various DoD directed energy weapons programs
offer higher electrical-to-optical efficiencies and overall laser performance, compact and
portable system size, less complexity and smaller weight, all at much lower system and
infrastructure cost. These lasers are scalable to megawatt-class beam power, and so
we roughly estimate that the overall system and infrastructure cost to deploy such laser
systems to launch a Lightcraft to LEO will be from several factors to an order of
magnitude (or more) lower than for the electron gun-driven CO2/gas mixture laser
system.
Removing the waste heat produced by high-power laser systems is an important factor
driving the physical limitations of scaling up the beam output power. An innovative
matched-refractive-index liquid is used to rapidly remove the heat produced by a 150
kW bulk slab solid-state laser weapon while the very high surface area-to-volume ratio
of high-power fiber lasers allows for the rapid removal of heat from the gain medium
without the need for external cooling. Phase-change materials are being explored and
devices using such materials have recently demonstrated the ability to store very large
quantities of the waste heat produced by high-power solid-state lasers, which is a
different way of rapidly removing large amounts of heat from the solid-state gain
medium. Unlike solid-state laser systems, free-electron lasers are not affected by heat
problems while their gain medium (a vacuum) cannot be damaged.
Launching a laser-propelled Lightcraft nanosat/picosat from the ground, sea, or air into
LEO requires controlling and steering the high-energy laser beam, while at the same
time making real-time adjustments to account for platform motion, optical train and
atmospheric effects on beam propagation, so that the beam maintains high quality,
low-loss, precision contact with the Lightcraft during the entire flight. Recent technical
innovations in optical train design and other system architecture have evolved beam
control devices for high-energy laser weapons toward new implementations. New beam
control devices and high-power optical train combinations have a resulting beam line
that is considerably simpler, smaller and lighter than current architectures. Almost
every component in the beam line performs multiple functions, thereby dramatically
reducing the high-power optical component count. This approach also packages all
beam control sensors, processors and drivers into a single turret assembly.
In 2005, the AFRL/PRSP (Edwards AFB, CA) concluded their laser Lightcraft propulsion
R&DTE program before launching a Lightcraft test vehicle into LEO was demonstrated
UNCLASSIFIED'I i'FAA: 061i1Clali.k W&& 8PtLY
69

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 77 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.