Documents / Official release

AAWSAP DIRD, High-Frequency Gravitational Wave Communications, April 2010

U.S. Department of War · 2010-04-06 · 57 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, DIA-08-1004-005, is dated 6 April 2010. The Defense Intelligence Agency's Defense Warning Office prepared it under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications program. It reviews proposed laboratory generators and detectors for high-frequency gravitational waves. It favors a piezoelectric approach for proof-of-concept tests, IR-excited molecules for an operational transmitter and the Li-Baker detector as the receiver. It estimates about 1.9 million bits per second over 7,000 km through the Earth and discusses timing standards and interplanetary navigation uses.

From the source:Release of 2026-09-18 Incident: 4/6/10, Las Vegas, Nevada. Released with redactions. This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD examines whether high-frequency gravitational waves could serve as a communications medium while avoiding the attenuation that limits radio-frequency systems. The report surveys proposed transmitter and detector concepts, argues that gravitational-wave communications could support secure point-to-point links, timing standards, and interplanetary navigation, and gives particular attention to laboratory generator concepts and the Li-Baker detector as possible building blocks for such a system. The document makes clear, however, that the entire concept depends on capabilities that had not been demonstrated in practice, including laboratory-scale generation and reliable detection of usable high-frequency gravitational-wave signals. It is an exploratory systems-oriented review built around a future communications concept.

UNCLASSIFIED//EOR OEEICI0L Llili QI\IL¥
quantitative estimate would be needed to ensure that the non-uniformity is not serious
in the present appl ication, but this is not expected to be a problem since field non
uniformity just produces non-uniform PPF generation in the interaction volume. The
fracta l membrane reflectors would still focus all the PPF at the receivers. The design
tradeoff will be whether one or two large magnets are more cost-effective than a larger
number of sma ller magnets. The design effort will be divided into two major sub-tasks:
off-the -shelf electromagnets currently available, and emerging -technology proposed
magnets that may become available during the construction phase of the HFGW
detector.
DDl.7.1 Off-the-shelf hardware: Excepting major installations, iron-core magnets
are limited to around 2T over small volumes so that superconducting magnets are
expected to be used here. Cryogen-free (more accurately, the cryogen is completely
enclosed and re-cycled each time the magnet is cooled for use) superconducting
magnets producing fields up to 16T are available commercia lly from a number of
manufacturers including Scientific Magnetics, Oxford Instruments, and Cryogen ic Ltd.
(all UK). As examples, Oxford Instruments can supply magnets producing 9T in a 20cm
bore, and ST in a 1m bore. Typica lly, cooling is provided by an integral Gifford
McMahon cryo-cooler at 4.2K. Use of a cryogen-free "dry" magnet means that there are
no cold seals to be a source of leaks.
DDl.7.2 Emerging technology: Since the detection PPF signal is directly proportional
to the static magnetic field value, the detector sensitivity will be increased by using
larger fields than currently-avai lable commercial designs permit. To this end we will
investigate the feasibility of co-developing with a third-party (for example, National
High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, Florida) a custom-made high-field design
capable of up to 35T (Bird, 2004), which may be real izable during the construction
phase of the Li-Baker detector. If successful, ach ieving this value of magnetic field
would improve the sensitivity of the Li-Baker detector by an order of magnitude. In this
case, if a separate refrigeration system is required, the specification would include
cryogen level-monitoring to ensure safe auto-rundown of the superconducting magnet if
the helium level falls below a pre-set value, to reduce the danger associated with
cryogenic -system related magnet failure .. I
Systems Engineering Tasks
Following the completion of the Li- Baker detector development tasks, plans and
specifications will be drawn up by LSU in collaboration with TSC. Since overlap of tasks
is possible, approximately 18 months will be allowed for the detector design, and
approximately 8 months for the preparation of plans and specifications. With
approximately two months overlap of the major tasks, a total of two years will be
schedu led for the detector's design and development of the plans and specifications.
Fig. 4.1a shows a Gannt chart for scheduling the project. For any large engineering
project, coordination among investigators is important for the development of a
coherent, unified design . This is the role of systems engineering tasks, depicted at the
top of Fig. 4.1a. In the present case, the development of the detector will demand the
close coordination of the detection link budget very early on, in order to carefu lly guide
the component design for each of the component areas, and to ensure that the
sensitivity goals can be met. This task culm inates in a review of the predicted signal-to
noise ratio. A follow-on to this task is the development of key component requirements
Interface requirements development is the next level of detail in systems engineering
UNCLASSIFIED/ /FOR OEEICIJ.b HSI!! Dflti
50

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 57 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.