Documents / Official release

AAWSAP DIRD, Materials for Advanced Aerospace Platforms, January 2010

U.S. Department of War · 2010-01-12 · 27 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, DIA-08-0912-008, is dated 12 January 2010. It was prepared by the Defense Warning Office's Acquisition Support Division at the Defense Intelligence Agency as one of a series of FY 2009 technology reports under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications program. It reviews materials for launch vehicles, space vehicles and reusable rocket engines, including aluminum alloys, polymer and metal matrix composites, titanium and nickel alloys, and titanium aluminides. It concludes that newer materials and integrated design could improve on the space shuttle.

From the source: Release of 2026-09-18 Incident: 1/12/10, Las Vegas, Nevada. Released with redactions. This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD surveys the structural materials needed for advanced aerospace platforms and argues that material choice cannot be separated from overall vehicle design, because launch vehicles, space vehicles, reusable systems, and propulsion hardware each face different temperature, durability, weight, and manufacturing constraints. The report reviews a range of candidate material classes, including advanced aluminum alloys; polymer-, aluminum-, and titanium-matrix composites; titanium alloys; nickel-base alloys; refractory metals; ceramic-matrix composites; carbon-carbon composites; and titanium aluminides. It emphasizes that balancing performance against practical limits such as fabrication methods, cost, inspection, contamination control, and service environment remains a major challenge. Its overall conclusion is that many promising materials exist, but their usefulness depends on application-specific tradeoffs and on closer integration of material selection with design and manufacturing, with some systems judged to be more valuable targets for development than others.

UNCLASSIFIED/ fFOA OFFI€1Ak Ulilii ONkY
ensure that any outgassing that occurs in space would not liberate any of this toxic
material-at least not where it could be ingested by the crew.
Al Matrix Composites
Al matrix composites (AMCs) are typically made by mixing short fibers or even
particulate silicon carbide (SiC) with Al alloy powder and hot-pressing or mechanically
consolidating the mixture by extrusion or forging. AMCs have higher modulus and
strength but suffer ductility losses owing to the hard, nondeforming SiC second phase.
They also are much better in fatigue because the SiC particles or short fibers mitigate
the effects of planar slip in precipitation-hardening alloy matrices. Machining, fusion
welding, or cold-forming AMCs is difficult. Mechanical fastening is possible, but drilling
fastener holes is difficult and expensive because the wear caused by the hard,
reinforcing phases shortens tool life.
Most of the AMCs produced to date have used relatively simple Al matrix alloys such as
6061 and 5083. This presumably is because of the conventional wisdom that AMCs are
not heat treatable and the perception that no benefit is gained by using more complex
alloy matrices. This is probably the case for a conventional solution treat-and-age
approach. Consequently, there has been little effort to optimize AMC systems. For the
right application where AMCs could provide a significant benefit, this could present an
opportunity. For example, using the high-temperature Al-Fe-Co-Ce alloy powder as the
matrix could prove interesting and might permit use of AMCs at up to 200 °Celsius-a
temperature at which Ti alloys do not provide any significant advantage, but one that is
too high for conventional Al alloys to be suitable.
In sum, while AMCs are not really a commercial materials system today, sufficient
research has been performed to establish proof of concept. If an adequate market for
AMCs were to emerge, the time and cost to make them commercially available could
prove acceptable.
Ti Alloys
Ti alloys also have been discussed earlier, but mainly in the context of heavy-section,
large-load-bearing applications for launch vehicles. Here, the potential of Ti alloys for
lighter gauge applications in the warm structure and the TPS is considered. Table 1
shows that at intermediate temperatures, Ti alloys are attractive in all aspects except
for specific stiffness. What this table does not capture is Ti alloys' propensity to react
with oxygen in the air to form an oxygen-stabilized a phase layer on the surface known
as a case. An example of a case is shown in Figure 3.
12
UNCLASSIFIED/ /FOA OFFICiI>k n&'lii ODIL¥

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 27 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.