Documents / Official release
Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957
U.S. Department of War · 1957-05-02 · 585 pages · text by GLM-OCR
This 1957 U.S. Navy personnel file was released under the U.S. Department of War name. It covers Chief Photographer Delbert Clement Newhouse, CWO-4, USN. It holds Records of Emergency Data from 1955 to 1957, a 2 May 1957 request that changed his home of record to Pensacola, Florida, and vouchers for his dependents' travel. It also includes fitness reports from his time as Photographic Officer at the U.S. Naval Base at Santa Elena Bay, Ecuador, and with the Fifteenth Naval District in 1942 and 1943. The file contains no UFO material.
From the source:Release of 2026-09-18 Incident: 5/2/57, N/A. This file contains the final personnel record of U.S. Navy Chief Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse, who left naval service as a Chief Warrant Officer 4, then the highest Warrant Officer grade. In July 1952, Newhouse recorded 16mm motion-picture film near Tremonton, Utah; the film later became the subject of a Project Blue Book investigation. Project Blue Book was the U.S. Air Force program active from 1952 to 1969 that investigated the nature and origin of unidentified flying objects (UFOs). In addition to documenting routine assignments and training, the file records Newhouse’s career progression as a Photographer’s Mate, a Navy enlisted specialty responsible for photography and related imaging work. Project Blue Book investigators characterized Newhouse as an expert photographer based on his naval experience.
“Cooper”32 pages
- p. 361 …He is tactful, cooperative, and has effectively handled numerous problems arising in this joint department undertaking…
- p. 474 …HEART WARMING TO LEARN OF THE WHOLEHEARTED COOPERATION AND MUTUAL SUPPORT BETWEEN UNITS OF THE SIXTHFLT…
- p. 477 …US HERE AT SUBIC X THE CONDUCT, COOPERATION, AND APPEARANCE OF YOUR SHIPS COMPANIES WERE MOST…
- p. 504 …Generally not cooperative. (Adverse)
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation…
- p. 506 …Serious gaps in his knowledge of fundamentals of his duty assignments. (Adverse)
• X •
(b) COOPERATION (Consider…
- p. 509 …Generally not cooperative. (Adverse)
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation…
- p. 514 …Serious gaps in his knowledge of fundamentals of his duty assignments. (Adverse)
• X •
(b) COOPERATION (Consider…
- p. 516 …Generally not cooperative. (Adverse)
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation…
- p. 518 …Serious gaps in his knowledge of fundamentals of his duty assignments. (Adverse)
• X •
(b) COOPERATION (Consider…
- p. 520 …Generally not cooperative. (Adverse)
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation…
- p. 522 …Serious gaps in his knowledge of fundamentals of his duty assignments. (Adverse)
• X •
(b) COOPERATION (Consider…
- p. 524 …Generally not cooperative. (Adverse)
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation…
- p. 526 …Generally not cooperative. (Adverse)
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation…
- p. 528 …Generally not cooperative. (Adverse)
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation…
- p. 530 …Serious gaps in his knowledge of fundamentals of his duty assignments.
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(b) COOPERATION…
- p. 532 …Generally not cooperative. (Adverse)
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation…
- p. 534 …Generally not cooperative. (Adverse)
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation…
- p. 536 …Generally not cooperative. (Adverse)
$\cdot$ X $\cdot$
(c) JUDGMENT (Consider his ability to grasp a situation…
- p. 537 …is directly inspired by his loyalty and cooperation. His quiet manner and dependability have gained the…
- p. 538 …X
(g) COOPERATION
(With reference to the faculty of working harmoniously with others toward the accomplishment…
- p. 539 …His loyalty and cooperation are an inspiration to his subordinates resulting in a higher rate of…
- p. 540 …Fairly courageous.
(g) COOPERATION
(With reference to the faculty of working harmoniously with others toward the…
- p. 541 …His loyalty and cooperation inspire subordinates to a high rate of efficiency and morale. CHPHOT Newhouse…
- p. 542 …Fairly courageous.
(g) COOPERATION(With reference to the faculty of working harmoniously with others toward the…
- p. 544 …Fairly courageous.
(g) COOPERATION
(With reference to the faculty of working harmoniously with others toward the…
- p. 545 …He is cooperative and inspires subordinates in the performance of their duties. His military and personal…
- p. 546 …Fairly courageous.
(g) COOPERATION
(With reference to the faculty of working harmoniously with others toward the…
- p. 548 …Fairly courageous.
(g) COOPERATION
(With reference to the faculty of working harmoniously with others toward the…
- p. 550 …Fairly courageous.
(g) COOPERATION
(With reference to the faculty of working harmoniously with others toward the…
- p. 552 …Fairly courageous.
(g) COOPERATION
(With reference to the faculty of working harmoniously with others toward the…
- p. 558 …He is tactful, cooperative, and has effectively handled numerous problems arising in this joint department undertaking…
- p. 578 …During the period covered by this report he has been very cooperative in all respects. He…
Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.
From: The Chief of Naval Personnel. To: IT. Delbert C. NEWHOUSE, USN.
Via: Supply Officer in Command Aviation Supply Depot Naval Supply Center Navy 128, c/o Fleet Post Office San Francisco, California
Subj: Your application for a commission in limited-duty status Bank for which eligible.
Refs: (a) Your application for a commission in limited duty status.
(b) BuPera Circ.Ltr. No. 174-47 as modified by BuPera Circ.Ltr. No. 245-47.
(c) BuPere Cire.Ltr. No. 175-47.
1. By careful review of reference (a) and your records in the Bureau, it has been determined that the lowest rank which you have indicated will be acceptable is higher than the highest rank for which you are eligible in accordance with reference (b). The highest rank for which you are eligible is LTJG.
2. The provisions of reference (c) require determination by the applicant of his eligibility, however, in order to protect your interests, it is assumed that you have misinterpreted references (b) and (c). Therefore, your application will be submitted to the Selection Board for consideration for appointment to the highest rank for which you are eligible.
3. If you desire to be considered for a lower rank as well as that given above, or to withdraw your application, you are directed to submit a signed statement to that effect.
3622
3621
EOM
Not linked to a story yet.
About this file
Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 585 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.