Documents / Report
This U.S. Air Force Project SIGN file from 1947 and 1948 collects correspondence on unidentified flying objects. In it, Headquarters USAF asks Air Materiel Command for its conclusions, and AMC replies on 8 November 1948 after studying about 180 incidents. AMC concludes that observers saw real flying objects but that there is no proof they are aircraft, and it advises against briefing the press. The file also includes letters to the CIA, a citizen's inquiry, a request for a Rand spaceship study and an intelligence analysis of 1947 sightings.
From the source:Release of 2026-08-07 Incident: 1947-1948, N/A. This file is a collection of U.S. Government memoranda and correspondence relating to “Project Sign,” a 1948 U.S. Air Force program to investigate reports of high-performance airborne objects. The documents characterize some of these reports as being consistent with “real” objects rather than fabrications or resulting from perceptual errors. The U.S. Air Force cites the reported characteristics of the phenomena, e.g., high speed and maneuverability, as exceeding known performance envelopes of U.S. military aircraft and thereby presenting a potential national security threat, if validated. This potential threat prompted the Air Force to call on the Air Materiel Command (AMC), the Service’s Major Command for logistics and procurement from 1946 to 1961, to gather further evidence to assess the validity of the reports. The Air Force emphasized that there was an “imperative need” for such evidence to enable appropriate countermeasures. The stated urgency of this request reflects the strategic environment of the early Cold War, a period characterized by heightened national defense concerns amid rapid global advancements in aerospace design and development. In framing the call for an investigation, the Air Force noted that sustained public interest and persistent inquiries from the press may eventually require an official statement in response. AMC’s investigation found that observers were generally not mistaken when reporting that they had seen an airborne object, but that their characterizations of those objects as unusual was likely a reflection of the “limits of their personal experience.” It identified “a great many” of the objects reported with a rounded appearance as “weather or upper air scientific balloons of some type.” It also identified several cases in which the reported objects were most likely celestial phenomena, such as Venus. AMC found that a small number of reports lacked a “reasonable everyday explanation,” but that “so far, no physical evidence of the existence of the unidentified sightings has been obtained.” AMC expressly considered whether the phenomena may have been “vehicles from another planet,” but found no evidence supporting such an origin. Ultimately, AMC found that “there is as yet no conclusive proof that unidentified flying objects, other than those which are known to be balloons, are real aircraft.” In light of these findings, AMC recommended that the Department of War should avoid publicly commenting on the subject of “flying discs.” Responding to the Air Force’s anticipated concerns regarding public interest in the subject, AMC recommended that the Department should reply in terms that minimize the investigation’s inconclusive findings, focusing on positive determinations in cases assessed to be weather balloons and celestial phenomena.
l\· • EJKtBIT IIA.. Project Si&n stuq Requμa.enta The po■sibllit7 that ao• n~ ~ u..'11dlntit1ed •rial •bj•c:t• that haw been r,ported beth in t.m t7nited Stat.a and in t'el'9111l land.a aq haft be•n •lCP•rhlental. 11paoe1bipa, or ten -..hiel•• fer the PUJ.'POH ot aHiatina in tM danlop11ent ot sp•••1:d.p1, baa been giffn consideration b7 t.hia C...-and. u •uoh en.rt actually' haft been ad.ghted, it i■ belieftd JION like~ that tbey repre■ent the et.tort ot a foteign nation, rather than a product froa beyond the Barth. Presen\ world lmowledp, techniques cid reaouroea are pnb&bl.7 adequat. to meet t.he Nquinmtnte for ~aoellh:ip construction, er at leut to eatabliah the pr-eliaina17 eJiperiJll9l'ltal foundation ~or auch an accoapli■aaent in the near future. In arq cue, the dlliaign and perfol'UDce pal'Qlttera oft.be or&ft would neoeHarily be in con.torunce and conn•~ With the eatal>llahed pr.l.ndplea ~ ou ecien~.. To ueiet in the collection•~ :ln.format1on., relatinc to UQ:l.denti t'ied aerial objects that IIQ' poa1ibq ~n•ent 119aceshipa or 1paoeahip test ~h1.clea, and to aeaist in the analyaia and evaluatio11 of wob. n ported craft, tecbD1cal intoru.tJ.on that include• ii.be d.1at1,laguim1nc deeip and per.tomance paraetere for 1pace8hipa 1• OOlladdered necee- •&1'7• • lfhile neh :1.nforu.tion 1• contained out.right, or illplicitl.7, ill the aerie• of Rand ProJect repona, ii\ would be ot aucn vai.u. to 1.bia Commend to havwa a llat of the aJ'•--ul deaign and perfor.aance charao teriatioa that are believed to Q.•tinguiah apaoeahip•, topther iritll ~ .turther ■cientifio elu•• that llicht um.at 1n theiJ" deteotion ad identif'ication, prepared b7 Band acientip.c per80mel. I • J
Report, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 245 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.