Documents / Report

Air Materiel Command Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, 1947-1948

U.S. Department of War · 1947 · 245 pages · text from the file's own layer

This U.S. Air Force Project SIGN file from 1947 and 1948 collects correspondence on unidentified flying objects. In it, Headquarters USAF asks Air Materiel Command for its conclusions, and AMC replies on 8 November 1948 after studying about 180 incidents. AMC concludes that observers saw real flying objects but that there is no proof they are aircraft, and it advises against briefing the press. The file also includes letters to the CIA, a citizen's inquiry, a request for a Rand spaceship study and an intelligence analysis of 1947 sightings.

From the source:Release of 2026-08-07 Incident: 1947-1948, N/A. This file is a collection of U.S. Government memoranda and correspondence relating to “Project Sign,” a 1948 U.S. Air Force program to investigate reports of high-performance airborne objects. The documents characterize some of these reports as being consistent with “real” objects rather than fabrications or resulting from perceptual errors. The U.S. Air Force cites the reported characteristics of the phenomena, e.g., high speed and maneuverability, as exceeding known performance envelopes of U.S. military aircraft and thereby presenting a potential national security threat, if validated. This potential threat prompted the Air Force to call on the Air Materiel Command (AMC), the Service’s Major Command for logistics and procurement from 1946 to 1961, to gather further evidence to assess the validity of the reports. The Air Force emphasized that there was an “imperative need” for such evidence to enable appropriate countermeasures. The stated urgency of this request reflects the strategic environment of the early Cold War, a period characterized by heightened national defense concerns amid rapid global advancements in aerospace design and development. In framing the call for an investigation, the Air Force noted that sustained public interest and persistent inquiries from the press may eventually require an official statement in response. AMC’s investigation found that observers were generally not mistaken when reporting that they had seen an airborne object, but that their characterizations of those objects as unusual was likely a reflection of the “limits of their personal experience.” It identified “a great many” of the objects reported with a rounded appearance as “weather or upper air scientific balloons of some type.” It also identified several cases in which the reported objects were most likely celestial phenomena, such as Venus. AMC found that a small number of reports lacked a “reasonable everyday explanation,” but that “so far, no physical evidence of the existence of the unidentified sightings has been obtained.” AMC expressly considered whether the phenomena may have been “vehicles from another planet,” but found no evidence supporting such an origin. Ultimately, AMC found that “there is as yet no conclusive proof that unidentified flying objects, other than those which are known to be balloons, are real aircraft.” In light of these findings, AMC recommended that the Department of War should avoid publicly commenting on the subject of “flying discs.” Responding to the Air Force’s anticipated concerns regarding public interest in the subject, AMC recommended that the Department should reply in terms that minimize the investigation’s inconclusive findings, focusing on positive determinations in cases assessed to be weather balloons and celestial phenomena.

~ HEJ.rQUAA'l'ERS
AIR MAT.ERIEL Cui1...I.ND
l.CI/Hla1/dill
\,right Field, Dayton, Ohio
16 Jan 48
SUBJECT: "Flying Discs"
TO: Chief of Staff
United ~ates Air Force
,\ashington 25, D. C.
AttBBtion: Lt. Col . George Garrett
Collection Branch, Air Intelligence lteq. Div .
Office, Director of Intelligence
l. An employee of this Department recently called the attention
of the undersigned to a number of letters appearing in A...AZING STO:rtl1S
Magazine on the subject of flying discs. Several past issues of the
magazine were then reviewed, and it does appear that the readers of
AMAZING STORIES have reported a number of such incidents which ,<rare
not previously available to the Air Forces. ~tis understood that
a feature article on this subject is under preparation by AMAZING
STOltThS. A preprint copy of this article, together with a copy of
the letters available on this subject, would be of considerable
interesti
2 . pt.ie to the nature of the publication Ar...AZING STORil!.S and
the unfavorable publicity which might accrue to the Air Force if an
official request were made for such material, this headquarters,cannot
contact the poblisher directly. It is therefore requested that arrange
ments be made through appropriate channels whereby the desired infor
mation may be obtained.
3. It is realized that the above request is unusual, however,
until such time as the so-called 11 l''lying Disc" phenanenon is laid to
rest, all possible sources of information should be utilized.
4 . aMAZING ~'TO.h.I.r:;S is published monthly by the Ziff- Davis
Publishing Canpany at 1$5 North \~abash Avenue, Chicago l, Illinois.
The New York office is located in the l!mpire $tate fuilding, New York
3, New York.
FOd 'l'lfo O:W..ANDING GL..NERAL:
/s/ H. k . 11.cCOY
Colonel, USAF
Chii.f of lnte~ligence

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 245 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.