Documents / Case file

Project Sign Progress Report, 1948

U.S. Department of War · 1948 · 45 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is an initial Project Sign progress report dated April 1948, sent from Headquarters, Air Materiel Command at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base to the Chief of Staff, U.S. Air Force. It tabulates about 100 unidentified flying object reports received through February 1948, covering shape, size, number of objects, speed and exhaust trails. Dr. Irving Langmuir found the data insufficient for a positive identification. Headquarters judged that a low aspect ratio aircraft using boundary layer control could reproduce many of the reported characteristics.

From the source:Release of 2026-07-10 Incident: 1948, Various. This file contains an initial report from the Air Materiel Command regarding Project Sign. Project Sign was a 1948-1949 U.S. Air Force program to investigate the nature and origin of unidentified flying objects (UFO). The report details 100 UFO sightings from 1947-1948. The file also contains an article excerpted from “The Aeroplane,” an aviation-focused periodical magazine published between 1911 and 1968, titled “The Biology of the Flying Saucer.”

,MARCH 19, 1948 337 THE AEROPLANE
The Biology of the Flying Saucer- III
By A. R. Wcyl, A.F.R.Ac.S.
Previous articles In this series appeared In " The Aeroplane" for February 13 and Morch 5
WI 0 -·1 UN l· L I F-••n S w.:rc made in I unn and at Rnme
of five C:anovo1 project\ {de-.cnbcd m the prcvtom tn\1,11-
"'!Cnl of 1h1, ar1de). It " in1erc,11ng 10 note that 1he Canov.1
d1-.c-wmg lype, d id not mal.e u,e of rellc'Crcws driven by two 100 b.h.p. engines mounted in 1andem
a n arr.rngemcnt. the wing system i, not tha1 of a di-.c. It is m the long fuselage. 1 he pilot's cockpit was located at the
more akin to primitive kites or. belier, to the paper dart of root of lhe fin, and a single·lrack undercarriage w.is adopted.
our school day~ which. a, we may be able to remember wi1h 1 here were. however, far too m.iny untried feature in th"
some mental effort, exhibited quite remarkable nying quali1ie, unusual design 10 make ii a ~rious proposi1ion. Nothing
more has been heard of Payen's cffoA~.and made better use <>four schoolbooh than we ever expt-ctcd.
A rcpresent:11ive of 1his aboriginal 1ype is shown in Fig. 19. l he ll)Odern ph:ll!e of .1he Flying Saucer aeroplane i,
It crashed during the first tests (which would not seem very charactcn1ed by two d1,ttncl development~. One is the
surprising in view of the; arrangement of engine, and air;crew,). hclicop1er-aeroplane, 1he other is the tranb•\onic or buper,on1c
Ano1her Je,s eccentric arrangement was the French Payen aeroplane. Hoth have bccome:-unforiunately--cs<;entially
single-seat racer of 1935. This was a daring experimental military dcvcl_opment~; the proJ_!re~~ is ~cnce bhroudcd in the
type with a 400 b.h.p. radia l engine. A n improved type, this u~ua I pretcnuou~ \ecrccy Iwhich implies that the potential
time more reasonable--a 70 b.h.p. light aeroplane- was enemy knows everything) v. hile the work is gravely hampered
constructed in 1936. To a very small. conventionally tapered by elabora1c securi1y precautions.
wing, a large triangu lar tail was fitted: the wing alone had The helicopter-aeroplane is not a novel idea. Many }Cars
d ihed ral. and the overall aspect ra1io was about 1.76. No ago, for in,iance, Nicola T e~la (famous for his elccirical
flights have bc.:n reported of one of these Payen aeroplanes. experiment~ wi1h high-frequency phenomena) bccured a pa1en1
but take-off attempts with the ~econd type seem to have for a taille,~ aeroplane equipped with a large lifting air~rcw
sugges1cd that with 1he small span the 1orque reaction of the pcrmi11ing a vertical ascent.
air,;crcw cannot be adequa1ely dealt with. In 1921 Claud Dornier ~ecured a pa1ent for a eonvcnlmnal
- - ·-~1/lO C
1110 CL Fig. 20.-Llft and
.__._ GI drag of wings oflL: different aspect
f 120 c• t • 0 ratio. (Left) W ind- \~
. : tunnel resultsI'--- 100 ,_ obtained at
Goettingen , in
~j 1920; Goettingen
- 389 aerofoil withn ...~~ 80 10 per cent. t hick-
~ eo t--t--;illt":!'-~ -+7"lr--+--+..-t---c¥~--+~ 19" ASPECT RATIO ness and square
~
.» 0 1 SQUARE v, ING wing tips. (Right)" ... 2 A reduction of the10
...a:; ~60 + r esults to an
A 3
~ ~( aspect ratio of... h 'w
0 (t f i v e. by t he•
1·
._u ,o 0 5 Prandtl Aerofoil
Theory of t h e
6:::;
t 4l Ind uced d ra g ,
() 7 s h o w s t hat a
~ w s quar e aerofoil
(aspect ratio of
.t one) does not
oQ-"11~t---t--t--:,~o- r-+ ---l- +-~ 20-+--+--I I D follow the theory.
- i--c
I
-I- 0 i€I Its induced drag is
ORAG C0EfFICIENT 100) 10 20 less than pre
I~ I I dicted by t heDRAG COEFFICIENT < 100) "h orse-s h o e'-- 20 vortex " assump-0. :
I t ion.NND 927545

Cases discussed

About this file

Case file, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 45 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.