Documents / Official release
This U.S. Air Force file gathers records of the USAF Scientific Advisory Board Ad Hoc Committee to Review Project Blue Book, dated 1965 to 1969. It holds Major General LeBailly's 1965 request for a review, meeting records from Wright-Patterson AFB, and Secretary Harold Brown's approval of a university scientific study. There are also 1969 letters praising the Condon Report, a 1968 NICAP request for records, a 1967 attendee list for a meeting with Dr. James McDonald, and a copy of the 1953 Robertson Panel report.
From the source:Release of 2026-07-10 Incident: 4/17/67, Various. This file documents the 1966-1967 deliberations and recommendations of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) Scientific Advisory Board’s Ad Hoc Committee to Review Project Blue Book. Project Blue Book was a 1952-1969 USAF program to investigate the nature and origin of unidentified flying objects (UFO). The Committee recommended that the USAF contract a scientific team composed of university-affiliated representatives to investigate selected UFO sightings. The USAF subsequently adopted the Committee’s recommendation.
.... DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. REPLY TO 2 ATTN OF: 1 January 1966 suaJEcr: Some SAFOI Thoughts for the SAB Ad Hoc Connnittee on UFOs TO: RECORD 1. On 21 January, I visited SAF0I and discussed the Air Force's concern over the UF0 preblem with Lt Col John P. Spaulding and Mrs. Sarah Hunt (4a 120 - 79079). 2. SAFOI gets many inquiries concerning the UFG problem. Last year they received and answered more than 3300 letters on UFOs including many from the President and the Congress. The problem essentially boils down to ene that is typified by the questien, "When did yau stop beating your wife?" Any answer the Air Force gives tends to incriminate the Air Force as a concealer of information and at the very least detracts from its image. SAFOI has to cope with this public relations problem and wants som~thing done about it. Therefore they have turned to the SAB. 3. The last time that a group of scientists looked into the scientific aspects of the UFO problem was in 1953. Attachment 1 is a copy of that report. 4. Basically the question is this--is there any such thing as a UFO? When the Air Force receives information on a UFO sighting they have several options open to them. First, they can categorically deny that there is anything such as a UFO. Second, they can cast reflections on the sighters mental ability or claim that he is trying to perpetrate a hoax on the country. Third, they can investigate the si ting as well as possible with their limited resources (3 men at FTD) and admit that the AF is looki.ng into the matter. Obviously, options one and two offer no solution. Thus, SAFOI has to rely on option three, and go through the normal si ting in vestigation (Attachment 2) that leads to admissions that there are a certain percentage of UFO sightings that the Air Force cannot identify. This a ke le like Fuller see Saturda Review ar ion and the AF has no rejoiner. Undtrwn'te Your Country's t - B~y U.S. Savings BotzdsNW 90306, Doclrl:34714841 Page 41
Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 85 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.