Documents / Report

Department of the Air Force Report, 1996

U.S. Department of War · 1996-09-10 · 181 pages · text from the file's own layer

This final report, dated September 10, 1996, was prepared by the Research Triangle Institute for the Department of the Air Force's 45th and 30th Space Wing safety offices. Titled Modeling Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, it shows how rare Mode-5 failures, in which a rocket veers well off its intended flight line, are modeled in the DAMP risk-analysis program. An appendix lists Atlas, Delta, Titan and Thor launch and failure histories through August 1996.

From the source:Release of 2026-05-08 Incident: 9/10/96, N/A. This report describes the Modeling of Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, documenting historical launch failure modes and recommending corrective actions to address them using novel modelling techniques.

  • p. 5 …64 6.4 Shaping Constants for Titan IV................................................................................ 65 6.5 Shaping Constants for LLVl .................................................................................... 69…
  • p. 74 …6.4 Shaping Constants for Titan IV Mode-5 shaping constants for Titan IV were developed…
  • p. 77 …Shaping Constants for Titan IV TB (sec) Breakupqa (deg-lb/ft2) B A II 300 none…
  • p. 109 …Titan IIIC and later configurations to include IIIB, IIID, IIIE, 34B, 34D, III/CT, IV, II…
  • p. 155 …Titan II SLV was developed from refurbished Titan II ICBMs incorporating technology and hardware from the…
  • p. 156 …Summa of Titan Vehicle Confi rations Descri Titan II ICBM converted to a man-rated vehicle…
  • p. 159 …2 0 54 WS (first Titan II) 03/16/62 II (N-2) ER 0 55…
  • p. 160 …08/13/64 II (8-7) WR 0 104 SV (first Titan Ill) 09/01/64…
  • p. 166 D.4.2 Titan Failure Narratives The following narratives provide available details about each Titan failure…
  • p. 168 …Stage II engine shut down prematurely due to oxidizer bootstrap-line failure. 76. Titan I (Mares…
  • p. 169 …Titan II (Thread Needle), 20 June 63, Response Mode 5, Flight Phase 2: Flight appeared normal…
  • p. 170 …Titan II (Bold Guy), 21 Sep 65, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: After a normal…
  • p. 172 …Following a successful Titan-II second-stage burn and after payload separation, the apogee- kick motor…
67. 281 (Transit 2A), 22 June 60, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2 and 5: Although
boost phase was normal, anomalous performance during second-stage bum
produced an orbit with apogee of 570 miles and perigee of 341 miles instead of the
planned 500-mile circular orbit.
68. 262 (Courier lA), 18 Aug 60, Response Mode 4T, Flight Phase 1: Hydraulic
pressure began a steady decay beginning about 18 seconds after liftoff. Severe
transients were noted at 129.3 seconds. Uncontrolled yaw, pitch, and roll
maneuvers began about 133 seconds. Between 138 and 143 seconds the missile
turned through three full revolutions in pitch. The upper stages separated· at
140.4 ·seconds and the first stage broke up about 142.8 seconds. The second stage
remained intact and was beacon tracked until 400 seconds.
70. 283 (Transit 3A), 30 Nov 60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: The first stage shut
down 11.2 seconds prematurely at 151.85 seconds when the MECO cutoff circuit
was armed. Since velocity at that time was about 2500 ft/ sec below the normal
cutoff velocity, portions of the first stage impacted in· Cuba. The second stage
separated and performed normally until shut down by the RSO at MECO plus
159.9 seconds to prevent overflight of South America.
71. 313 (Transit 3B), 21 Feb 61, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 4 and 5: Second bum
of second stage failed to occur. This resulted in an orbit with perigee of 539 miles
and apogee of 92 miles instead of the planned 500-mile circular orbit.
75. 311 (Composite I), 24 Jan 62, Response Mode 5, Flight Phase 2: Flight was within
acceptable limits until second-stage ignition. Probably because of rupture of the
lower oxidizer manifold, normal thrust levels never developed. About 50
milliseconds after ignition, severe thrust chamber motion developed and the
second stage began to tumble. Telemetry indicated that the first tumble period
was about 29 seconds. Propellant depletion occurred at MECO plus 212 seconds.
The nominal first-bum duration was 378 seconds.
77. 314 (ANNA lA), 10 May 62, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: After a successful
Thor flight, an electrical malfunction prevented separation and second-stage
ignition.
81. 240 (Asset-2), 24 Mar 64, Response Mode 4; Flight Phase 2: The second stage either
failed to ignite or burned for only one second.
9/10/96 170

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 181 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.