Documents / Report

Department of the Air Force Report, 1996

U.S. Department of War · 1996-09-10 · 181 pages · text from the file's own layer

This final report, dated September 10, 1996, was prepared by the Research Triangle Institute for the Department of the Air Force's 45th and 30th Space Wing safety offices. Titled Modeling Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, it shows how rare Mode-5 failures, in which a rocket veers well off its intended flight line, are modeled in the DAMP risk-analysis program. An appendix lists Atlas, Delta, Titan and Thor launch and failure histories through August 1996.

From the source:Release of 2026-05-08 Incident: 9/10/96, N/A. This report describes the Modeling of Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, documenting historical launch failure modes and recommending corrective actions to address them using novel modelling techniques.

  • p. 88 …Vehicle loses control at or shortly after liftoff, with all flight directions equally likely. Destruct is…
  • p. 106 …121 (8) Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis…
  • p. 111 …Such behavior did not necessarily prevent the attainment of some, or even all, mission objectives. 50…
  • p. 131 …Due to excess speed, spacecraft passed 22,000 miles in front of moon, and primary mission…
  • p. 132 …Although Atlas performance was satisfactory, the mission was apparently a failure. No other data available. 134…
  • p. 133 …A flight-control malfunction occurred at about 15 seconds at the start of the pitch program…
  • p. 137 …Vehicle became unstable when B2 pitch control was lost at 121 seconds. Loss of pitch control…
  • p. 138 …The missile then lost attitude control, executing a hard yaw rate tum throughout and beyond the…
  • p. 139 …of the rate gyro or an electrical failure in the pitch channel of the flight control…
  • p. 140 caused yaw and roll rates that the flight control system could not correct. As a result…
  • p. 151 …Attitude control lost during second stage coast period. Third stage spun up, but did not fire…
  • p. 153 …One solid-rocket motor carried to MECO, but mission was still a complete success. 102. SMS…
  • p. 169 …Missile tumbled out of control at 130 seconds, then broke up. 104. IHA (65-210), 1…
  • p. 170 …Nominal mission through transtage second burn shutdown. Attitude control system engine failed to shutdown following vernier…
  • p. 171 …However, satellite propulsion system malfunctioned putting satellite in uncontrollable position with no possibility of restoring mission…
  • p. 172 …control until propellant depletion. Trajectory inaccuracies were compensated for during Stage-2 burn, and the mission…
  • p. 180 …Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis (SEO), 1957…
vehicle was destroyed by the RSO at 152 seconds. Missile impacted about 60
miles downrange.
12. 120, 28 Feb 58, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: Failure of fuel line caused
premature main engine shutdown at 109.7 seconds.
13. 121, 19 Apr 58, Response Mode 1, Flight Phase 1: Failure of fuel system resulted in
loss of thrust shortly after liftoff. Missile fell back on pad after reaching an
altitude of about 4 feet.
14. 116 (Able I), 23 Apr 58, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: A turbopump failure at
146.2 seconds resulted in main-engine shutdown and an explosion.
18. 123, 11 July 58, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: Although the flight was,
regarded as a success, the main· engine failed to respond to the guidance
shutdown command due to a wiring failure. When the main engine was shut
down 0.43 seconds later by a backup command, the vernier engines also shut
down. A large overshoot resulted from the late shutdown.
20. 126, 26 July 58, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: An inadvertent closing of the
main-engine- liquid-oxygen valve terminated thrust at 58.4 seconds. Missile
components were recovered about 5 miles downrange.
22. 127 (Able I), 17 Aug 58, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: A turbopump failure
led to main engine shutdown at about 74 seconds. An explosion followed with
impact about 10 miles downrange.
23. 130 (Pioneer I), 11 Oct 58, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2 & 5: Cow upper-
stage thrust reduced the planned orbital altitude from 250,000 nm to 90,000 nm.
24. 138, 5 Nov 58, Response Mode 5, Flight Phase 1: Shortly after liftoff the missile
began drifting uprange and to the left, reaching a maximum uprange drift of 150
feet. It continued diverging to the left of the nominal flight path until a pitch-gyro
failure caused an excessive pitch down. Shortly thereafter at 34.6 seconds,
command destruct occurred.
25. 129 (Able I), 8 Nov 58, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 3: After a normal boost
phase, the third-stage (Allegheny Ballistic X-248-A3) solid-propellant motor failed
to ignite.
26. 140, 26 Nov 58, Response Mode 5, Flight Phase 1: Erratic performance of the
guidance-system inverter at 111.4 seconds resulted in erroneous accelerometer
scale factors and a 37 mile overshoot of target. Flight was regarded as a success.
27. 145, 5 Dec 58, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: Although the flight was
considered successful, below-normal thrust throughout flight resulted in fuel
9/10/96 168 RTI

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 181 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.