Documents / Report

Department of the Air Force Report, 1996

U.S. Department of War · 1996-09-10 · 181 pages · text from the file's own layer

This final report, dated September 10, 1996, was prepared by the Research Triangle Institute for the Department of the Air Force's 45th and 30th Space Wing safety offices. Titled Modeling Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, it shows how rare Mode-5 failures, in which a rocket veers well off its intended flight line, are modeled in the DAMP risk-analysis program. An appendix lists Atlas, Delta, Titan and Thor launch and failure histories through August 1996.

From the source:Release of 2026-05-08 Incident: 9/10/96, N/A. This report describes the Modeling of Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, documenting historical launch failure modes and recommending corrective actions to address them using novel modelling techniques.

  • p. 88 …Vehicle loses control at or shortly after liftoff, with all flight directions equally likely. Destruct is…
  • p. 106 …121 (8) Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis…
  • p. 111 …Such behavior did not necessarily prevent the attainment of some, or even all, mission objectives. 50…
  • p. 131 …Due to excess speed, spacecraft passed 22,000 miles in front of moon, and primary mission…
  • p. 132 …Although Atlas performance was satisfactory, the mission was apparently a failure. No other data available. 134…
  • p. 133 …A flight-control malfunction occurred at about 15 seconds at the start of the pitch program…
  • p. 137 …Vehicle became unstable when B2 pitch control was lost at 121 seconds. Loss of pitch control…
  • p. 138 …The missile then lost attitude control, executing a hard yaw rate tum throughout and beyond the…
  • p. 139 …of the rate gyro or an electrical failure in the pitch channel of the flight control…
  • p. 140 caused yaw and roll rates that the flight control system could not correct. As a result…
  • p. 151 …Attitude control lost during second stage coast period. Third stage spun up, but did not fire…
  • p. 153 …One solid-rocket motor carried to MECO, but mission was still a complete success. 102. SMS…
  • p. 169 …Missile tumbled out of control at 130 seconds, then broke up. 104. IHA (65-210), 1…
  • p. 170 …Nominal mission through transtage second burn shutdown. Attitude control system engine failed to shutdown following vernier…
  • p. 171 …However, satellite propulsion system malfunctioned putting satellite in uncontrollable position with no possibility of restoring mission…
  • p. 172 …control until propellant depletion. Trajectory inaccuracies were compensated for during Stage-2 burn, and the mission…
  • p. 180 …Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis (SEO), 1957…
127. Titan II (Bold Guy), 21 Sep 65, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: After a normal
first-stage flight, the second stage was shut down immediately after start by an
erroneous guidance command.
128. IIIC (65-212), 15 Oct 65, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 4 and 5: Normal
mission through transtage second ignition and bum. One chamber of transtage
engine failed to shutdown completely, resulting in a pitch-up deviation, loss of
control, vehicle tumbling, and an unplanned orbit.
131. Titan II (Cross Fire), 30 Nov 65, Response Mode 5, Flight Phase 2: Trouble
apparently began between 208 and 214 seconds when the rate and track beacons
were lost. The radar tracked till about 360 - 380 seconds, indicating a ballistic-
type trajectory veering to the right. Loss of control was due to a fuel leak at the
crossover manifold.
134. IIIC (66-001), 21 Dec 65, Vehicle 8, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 5: Nominal
mission through transtage second burn shutdown. Attitude control system engine
failed to shutdown following vernier bum with resulting fuel depletion and loss
of attitude control.
135. Titan II (Sea Rover), 22 Dec 65, Response Mode 4T, Flight Phase 2: Flight was
apparently normal until some point well into second-stage bum. Track then
indicated erratic movement left of nominal, then right of nominal, but with little
downrange movement of the IP. Automatic fuel cutoff was sent at 396 seconds.
Failure resulted from improper rigging of sustainer actuator that exceeded
control-system capability.
142. Titan II (Silver Bullet), 24 May 66, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2.5: Flight was
normal except that R/V did not separate, causing a 20-mile uprange miss.
148. IIIC (66-005), 26 Aug 66, Vehicle 12, Response Mode 4T, Flight Phase 0: Payload
fairing failed during Stage-0 powered flight. The failure at 79 seconds resulted in
violent maneuvering and self destruct (ISDS).
159. Titan II (Glamour Girl), 12 Apr 67, Response Mode 4T, Flight Phase 2: First-stage
flight was normal. About 15 seconds after second-stage ignition, failure of the
yaw-rate gyro resulted in violent roll and pitch maneuvers. Missile impacted
about 660 miles downrange.
160. IIIB/ Agena D (Busy Tailor), 26 Apr 67, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: Flight
appeared normal through first-stage cutoff and separation. About 15 seconds into
the second stage, a fuel-line blockage resulted in a drop in chamber pressure that
reduced the thrust to about half its normal level. As a result, the velocitvJ
eventually stopped increasing. The IP moved slightly farther downrange and
remained on azimuth until loss of signal at 300 seconds. Impact was about 600
miles downrange.
9/10/96 161 RTI

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 181 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.