Documents / Report

Department of the Air Force Report, 1996

U.S. Department of War · 1996-09-10 · 181 pages · text from the file's own layer

This final report, dated September 10, 1996, was prepared by the Research Triangle Institute for the Department of the Air Force's 45th and 30th Space Wing safety offices. Titled Modeling Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, it shows how rare Mode-5 failures, in which a rocket veers well off its intended flight line, are modeled in the DAMP risk-analysis program. An appendix lists Atlas, Delta, Titan and Thor launch and failure histories through August 1996.

From the source:Release of 2026-05-08 Incident: 9/10/96, N/A. This report describes the Modeling of Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, documenting historical launch failure modes and recommending corrective actions to address them using novel modelling techniques.

  • p. 88 …Vehicle loses control at or shortly after liftoff, with all flight directions equally likely. Destruct is…
  • p. 106 …121 (8) Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis…
  • p. 111 …Such behavior did not necessarily prevent the attainment of some, or even all, mission objectives. 50…
  • p. 131 …Due to excess speed, spacecraft passed 22,000 miles in front of moon, and primary mission…
  • p. 132 …Although Atlas performance was satisfactory, the mission was apparently a failure. No other data available. 134…
  • p. 133 …A flight-control malfunction occurred at about 15 seconds at the start of the pitch program…
  • p. 137 …Vehicle became unstable when B2 pitch control was lost at 121 seconds. Loss of pitch control…
  • p. 138 …The missile then lost attitude control, executing a hard yaw rate tum throughout and beyond the…
  • p. 139 …of the rate gyro or an electrical failure in the pitch channel of the flight control…
  • p. 140 caused yaw and roll rates that the flight control system could not correct. As a result…
  • p. 151 …Attitude control lost during second stage coast period. Third stage spun up, but did not fire…
  • p. 153 …One solid-rocket motor carried to MECO, but mission was still a complete success. 102. SMS…
  • p. 169 …Missile tumbled out of control at 130 seconds, then broke up. 104. IHA (65-210), 1…
  • p. 170 …Nominal mission through transtage second burn shutdown. Attitude control system engine failed to shutdown following vernier…
  • p. 171 …However, satellite propulsion system malfunctioned putting satellite in uncontrollable position with no possibility of restoring mission…
  • p. 172 …control until propellant depletion. Trajectory inaccuracies were compensated for during Stage-2 burn, and the mission…
  • p. 180 …Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis (SEO), 1957…
81. Titan II (Thread Needle), 20 June 63, Response Mode 5, Flight Phase 2: Flight
appeared normal until BECO at about 146 seconds. The staging event seemed
abnormally long, due to· low second-stage thrust that remained considerably
below normal thereafter because of reduced oxidizer flow through the gas-
generator injector. The vehicle nevertheless followed closely to the intended
ground track, albeit well behind schedule. At about 480 seconds (and some three
minutes behind schedule), the missile began a slow turn to the left. A SECO
indication was noted about 10 seconds later. Destruct was sent at 532 seconds
after all track was lost.
82. Titan I (Silver Spur), 16 July 63, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: The flight was
normal through first-stage cutoff. Separation occurred but the second~stage failed·
to ignite.
85. Titan I (Polar Route), 30 Aug 63, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2.5: The flight
appeared normal through the first and second-stage thrusting periods. At SECO
the vernier engines also shut down, apparently due to shutdown of the gas
generator.
89. II (Fire Truck), 9 Nov 63, Response Mode 4T, Flight Phase 1: Missile tumbled out
of control at 130 seconds, then broke up.
104. IHA (65-210), 1 Sep 64, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 4: Nominal mission
through first transtage burn. Transtage propellant-tank pressurization system
• failed with resultant reduction in thrust. Vehicle impacted about 2700 miles
downrange.
107. Titan I (West Wind I), 8 Dec 64, Response Mode 5, Flight Phase 1: A first-stage
power-level malfunction combined with guidance deviations caused the missile to
drift far to the left, then over-correct far to the right, passing north of Midway Is.
No other data available.
109. Titan I (West Wind III), 14 Jan 65, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: First-stage
flight was apparently normal, but second stage failed to ignite.
112. Titan I (West Wind II), 5 Mar 65, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: Missile
impacted on azimuth about 80 miles short of target due to propellant depletion.
116. Titan I (Card Deck), 30 Apr 65, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: Flight appeared
normal until around 100 seconds when the IP slowed and then stopped due to a
turbopump failure. The missile self-destructed at about 115 seconds with the
impact point about 115 miles offshore.
120. Titan II (Gold Fish), 14 Jun 65, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2.5: Vehicle
apparently failed during the vernier solo phase due to·loss of a vernier nozzle.
9/10/96 160 RT!

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 181 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.