Documents / Report

Department of the Air Force Report, 1996

U.S. Department of War · 1996-09-10 · 181 pages · text from the file's own layer

This final report, dated September 10, 1996, was prepared by the Research Triangle Institute for the Department of the Air Force's 45th and 30th Space Wing safety offices. Titled Modeling Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, it shows how rare Mode-5 failures, in which a rocket veers well off its intended flight line, are modeled in the DAMP risk-analysis program. An appendix lists Atlas, Delta, Titan and Thor launch and failure histories through August 1996.

From the source:Release of 2026-05-08 Incident: 9/10/96, N/A. This report describes the Modeling of Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, documenting historical launch failure modes and recommending corrective actions to address them using novel modelling techniques.

  • p. 88 …Vehicle loses control at or shortly after liftoff, with all flight directions equally likely. Destruct is…
  • p. 106 …121 (8) Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis…
  • p. 111 …Such behavior did not necessarily prevent the attainment of some, or even all, mission objectives. 50…
  • p. 131 …Due to excess speed, spacecraft passed 22,000 miles in front of moon, and primary mission…
  • p. 132 …Although Atlas performance was satisfactory, the mission was apparently a failure. No other data available. 134…
  • p. 133 …A flight-control malfunction occurred at about 15 seconds at the start of the pitch program…
  • p. 137 …Vehicle became unstable when B2 pitch control was lost at 121 seconds. Loss of pitch control…
  • p. 138 …The missile then lost attitude control, executing a hard yaw rate tum throughout and beyond the…
  • p. 139 …of the rate gyro or an electrical failure in the pitch channel of the flight control…
  • p. 140 caused yaw and roll rates that the flight control system could not correct. As a result…
  • p. 151 …Attitude control lost during second stage coast period. Third stage spun up, but did not fire…
  • p. 153 …One solid-rocket motor carried to MECO, but mission was still a complete success. 102. SMS…
  • p. 169 …Missile tumbled out of control at 130 seconds, then broke up. 104. IHA (65-210), 1…
  • p. 170 …Nominal mission through transtage second burn shutdown. Attitude control system engine failed to shutdown following vernier…
  • p. 171 …However, satellite propulsion system malfunctioned putting satellite in uncontrollable position with no possibility of restoring mission…
  • p. 172 …control until propellant depletion. Trajectory inaccuracies were compensated for during Stage-2 burn, and the mission…
  • p. 180 …Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis (SEO), 1957…
D.4.2 Titan Failure Narratives
The following narratives provide available details about each Titan failure since the
beginning of the Titan I program in 1959. The narratives are numbered to match the
flight-sequence numbers in Section D.4.1.
7. B-5, 14 Aug 59, Response Mode 1, Flight Phase 1: Umbilicals were prematurely
pulled from missile resulting in engine shutdown and impact on pad.
8. C-3, 12 Dec 59, Response Mode 1, Flight Phase 1: Missile destroyed itself just
before liftoff.
10. C-4, 5 Feb 60, Response Mode 4T, Flight Phase 1: While pitch program was in
progress, a structural failure occurred in transition section. Nose cone broke off,
and missile lost aerodynamic stability. Shortly after, an explosion and fire
destroyed the missile.
12. C-1, 8 Mar 60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: Failure of gas-generator valve to
open prevented Stage-II ignition.
13. G-5, 22 Mar ·60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2.5: Premature shut down of
vernier engines resulted in impact 38 miles short of target.
14. C-5, 8 Apr 60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: Although Stage-I performance
was low, Stage II successfully separated and ignited. All data were lost about 50
seconds later, apparently due to malfunction of Stage II turbopump.
20. J-2, 1 Jul 60, Response Mode 2, Flight Phase 1: Shortly after launch, hydraulic
power to engine actuators was lost so control could not be maintained. The
missile veered northwest and pitched down (Flight azimuth was 105.97°). Missile
was destroyed by RSO 11 seconds after liftoff.
21. J-4, 28 July 60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: Stage I thrusting flight was
terminated prematurely at 101 seconds (Nominal, 136 seconds). Stage II engine
did not start, apparently because the auxiliary turbopumps did not receive
sufficient head pressure to effect a successful start.
22. J-7, 10 Aug 60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: Stage II engine shutdown 0.17
seconds early and solo vernier operation did not occur. Impact was 107 miles
short of target.
25. G-8, 29 Sep 60, Response Mo.de 4, Flight Phase 1: Stage I shut down prematurely
when a low-level sensor malfunctioned and ceased to be locked out. Stage II
performed properly but shutdown prematurely due to propellant depletion. The
impact was some 3600 miles short of the 8700-mile target point.
9/10/96 157 RTI

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 181 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.