Documents / Report

Department of the Air Force Report, 1996

U.S. Department of War · 1996-09-10 · 181 pages · text from the file's own layer

This final report, dated September 10, 1996, was prepared by the Research Triangle Institute for the Department of the Air Force's 45th and 30th Space Wing safety offices. Titled Modeling Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, it shows how rare Mode-5 failures, in which a rocket veers well off its intended flight line, are modeled in the DAMP risk-analysis program. An appendix lists Atlas, Delta, Titan and Thor launch and failure histories through August 1996.

From the source:Release of 2026-05-08 Incident: 9/10/96, N/A. This report describes the Modeling of Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, documenting historical launch failure modes and recommending corrective actions to address them using novel modelling techniques.

  • p. 155 D.4 Titan Launch and Performance History The Titan family of launch vehicles was established in…
  • p. 160 …GEMINI GT-4 06/03/65 II (G-4) ER 0 120 GOLD FISH 06/14…
  • p. 161 …30/65 II (B-4) WR 5 2 0 132 SV: GEMINI GT-7 12/04…
D.4.2 Titan Failure Narratives
The following narratives provide available details about each Titan failure since the
beginning of the Titan I program in 1959. The narratives are numbered to match the
flight-sequence numbers in Section D.4.1.
7. B-5, 14 Aug 59, Response Mode 1, Flight Phase 1: Umbilicals were prematurely
pulled from missile resulting in engine shutdown and impact on pad.
8. C-3, 12 Dec 59, Response Mode 1, Flight Phase 1: Missile destroyed itself just
before liftoff.
10. C-4, 5 Feb 60, Response Mode 4T, Flight Phase 1: While pitch program was in
progress, a structural failure occurred in transition section. Nose cone broke off,
and missile lost aerodynamic stability. Shortly after, an explosion and fire
destroyed the missile.
12. C-1, 8 Mar 60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: Failure of gas-generator valve to
open prevented Stage-II ignition.
13. G-5, 22 Mar ·60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2.5: Premature shut down of
vernier engines resulted in impact 38 miles short of target.
14. C-5, 8 Apr 60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: Although Stage-I performance
was low, Stage II successfully separated and ignited. All data were lost about 50
seconds later, apparently due to malfunction of Stage II turbopump.
20. J-2, 1 Jul 60, Response Mode 2, Flight Phase 1: Shortly after launch, hydraulic
power to engine actuators was lost so control could not be maintained. The
missile veered northwest and pitched down (Flight azimuth was 105.97°). Missile
was destroyed by RSO 11 seconds after liftoff.
21. J-4, 28 July 60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: Stage I thrusting flight was
terminated prematurely at 101 seconds (Nominal, 136 seconds). Stage II engine
did not start, apparently because the auxiliary turbopumps did not receive
sufficient head pressure to effect a successful start.
22. J-7, 10 Aug 60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: Stage II engine shutdown 0.17
seconds early and solo vernier operation did not occur. Impact was 107 miles
short of target.
25. G-8, 29 Sep 60, Response Mo.de 4, Flight Phase 1: Stage I shut down prematurely
when a low-level sensor malfunctioned and ceased to be locked out. Stage II
performed properly but shutdown prematurely due to propellant depletion. The
impact was some 3600 miles short of the 8700-mile target point.
9/10/96 157 RTI

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 181 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.