Documents / Report

Department of the Air Force Report, 1996

U.S. Department of War · 1996-09-10 · 181 pages · text from the file's own layer

This final report, dated September 10, 1996, was prepared by the Research Triangle Institute for the Department of the Air Force's 45th and 30th Space Wing safety offices. Titled Modeling Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, it shows how rare Mode-5 failures, in which a rocket veers well off its intended flight line, are modeled in the DAMP risk-analysis program. An appendix lists Atlas, Delta, Titan and Thor launch and failure histories through August 1996.

From the source:Release of 2026-05-08 Incident: 9/10/96, N/A. This report describes the Modeling of Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, documenting historical launch failure modes and recommending corrective actions to address them using novel modelling techniques.

  • p. 88 …Vehicle loses control at or shortly after liftoff, with all flight directions equally likely. Destruct is…
  • p. 106 …121 (8) Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis…
  • p. 111 …Such behavior did not necessarily prevent the attainment of some, or even all, mission objectives. 50…
  • p. 131 …Due to excess speed, spacecraft passed 22,000 miles in front of moon, and primary mission…
  • p. 132 …Although Atlas performance was satisfactory, the mission was apparently a failure. No other data available. 134…
  • p. 133 …A flight-control malfunction occurred at about 15 seconds at the start of the pitch program…
  • p. 137 …Vehicle became unstable when B2 pitch control was lost at 121 seconds. Loss of pitch control…
  • p. 138 …The missile then lost attitude control, executing a hard yaw rate tum throughout and beyond the…
  • p. 139 …of the rate gyro or an electrical failure in the pitch channel of the flight control…
  • p. 140 caused yaw and roll rates that the flight control system could not correct. As a result…
  • p. 151 …Attitude control lost during second stage coast period. Third stage spun up, but did not fire…
  • p. 153 …One solid-rocket motor carried to MECO, but mission was still a complete success. 102. SMS…
  • p. 169 …Missile tumbled out of control at 130 seconds, then broke up. 104. IHA (65-210), 1…
  • p. 170 …Nominal mission through transtage second burn shutdown. Attitude control system engine failed to shutdown following vernier…
  • p. 171 …However, satellite propulsion system malfunctioned putting satellite in uncontrollable position with no possibility of restoring mission…
  • p. 172 …control until propellant depletion. Trajectory inaccuracies were compensated for during Stage-2 burn, and the mission…
  • p. 180 …Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis (SEO), 1957…
131. LV-3A/ Agena B (Rubber Gun), 17 June 62, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 3:
Although Atlas performance was satisfactory, the mission was apparently a
failure. No other data available.
134. 67E (Extra Bonus), 13 July 62, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2 and 2.5: A LOX
leak in the high-pressure line apparently froze sustainer control components.
Residual sustainer thrust after cutoff continued for some 30 seconds, causing a
120-mile overshoot.
137. 145D (Mariner R-1), 22 July 62, Response Mode 5, Flight Phase 2: Booster stage
and flight appeared normal until after booster staging at guidance enable at about
157 seconds. Operation of guidance rate beacon was intermittent. Due to this and
faulty guidance equations, erroneous guidance commands were given based on
invalid rate data. Vehicle deviations became evident at 172 seconds and
continued throughout flight with a maximum yaw deviation of 60° and pitch
deviation of 28° occurring at 270 seconds. The vehicle deviated grossly from the
planned trajectory in azimuth and velocity, and executed abnormal maneuvers in
pitch and yaw. The missile was destroyed by the RSO at 293.5 seconds, some 12
seconds after SECO.
141. 87D (Peg Board II), 9 Aug 62, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2.5: Failure of the
sustainer/vernier hydraulic system to maintain system pressure prevented
normal operation during the vernier solo phase.
142. 57F (Crash Truck), 10 Aug 62, Response Mode 5, Flight Phase 1: The roll program
failed. The missile was destroyed by the RSO at 68 seconds.
144. 179D (Mariner R-2), 27 Aug 62, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2: Flight was
successful although roll control was lost during the period from 140 seconds to
190 seconds due to erratic performance of vernier engine #2. Before and after this
time interval, vernier #2 and all other Atlas and Agena systems performed
normally.·
146. 4D (Briar Street), 2 Oct 62, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: The missile self-
destructed at 183 seconds. The vernier engines shut down prematurely at 46
seconds. Subsequently, closure of the vernier bleed valves led to excessively high
sustainer performance and premature shutdown at 181.3 seconds.
148. 215 D (Ranger-5), 18 Oct 62, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 5: Flight was
regarded as successful although failure in the ground control system 35 minutes
after launch prevented accomplishment of primary lunar impact and study
m1ss10n. The guidance .rate beacon failed at 94.6 seconds but backup
differentiated tracking data kept the vehicle within normal limits.
153. 13F (Action Time), 14 Nov 62, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: The flight was
terminated when sustainer and vernier engines shut down prematurely at
9/10/96 123 RTI

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 181 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.